Eviction
Eviction notice
Advance notice that someone must leave a property. He was charged with failing to comply with a government eviction notice to leave his home. The council obtained an eviction notice. We were served with an eviction notice yesterday.
Showing 1–12 of 14 results
- Sale!
NOTICE TO TENANT FOR EVICTION FOR NON PAYMENT OF RENT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of notice of demand of rent to the Tenant under the provisions of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and warning that in case of default the legal actions and consequences shall follow (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ONLY)
₹350.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE TO TENANT FOR EVICTION FOR UNLAWFULLY SUB LETTING THE TENANTED PREMISES UNDER THE PROVISIONS THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of eviction notice to the tenant for unlawfully subletting the same to a third party without the consent of the Landlord under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999(FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA)
₹350.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE TO TENANT FOR EVICTION ON THE GROUND OF CAUSING NUISANCE AND ANNOYANCE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction notice to tenant for eviction on the ground of causing nuisance and annoyance under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999
₹350.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION NOTICE TO GRATUITOUS LICENSEE
This is a precedent of an eviction notice to the gratuitous licensee for vacating the subject premises.
₹350.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT (OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE) FOR SEEKING EVICTION OF THE TENANT ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT AND PERMITTED INCREASES UNDER SECTION 15(2) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil Judge for seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent and permitted increases under Section 15(2) of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ONLY)
₹700.00 Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS COMMITTED ACTS CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 108 (o) OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 AS ALSO OF 16(1) (a) AND 16(1) (b) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court for recovery of possession on the ground that the Tenant has committed any act contrary to the provisions of clause (o) of section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in violation of 16(1) (a), 16(1) (b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 by damaging the suit premises and carrying out structural changes of a permanent nature.
₹700.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700.00 Add to Cart - Sale!
LICENSE AND EVICTION SUIT FOR EVICTION OF GRATUITOUS LICENSEE UNDER THE SECTION 41 OF THE PRESIDENCY SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT, 1882 OR LICENSE AND EVICTION SUIT FOR EVICTION OF GRATUITOUS LICENSEE UNDER THE SECTION 26 OF THE PROVINCIAL SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT, 1887
This is a precedent of suit to be filed, before the Small Causes Court or Court of Civil Judge for recovery of possession on the ground that the occupant was the gratuitous licensee whose license is terminated and unlawfully continuing to be in use and occupation of the suit premises , under section 41 of the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 and under section 26 of The Provincial Small Causes Court Act,1887.
₹700.00 Add to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION FOR EVICTION OF TENANT UNDER SECTION 14(1)(e) OF DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 (AS AMENDED UPTO DATE) ON THE GROUND OF BONAFIDE REQUIREMENT OF THE LANDLORD
The Tenancy is governed under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The premises is occupied by tenant. The landlord needs the premises for his own bona fide requirement. This is the precedent of eviction of Tenant on the ground of Bona fide requirement of the Landlord.
₹350.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart