Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
ADMIRALTY SUIT FOR MARITIME CLAIM
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Plaintiff has maritime claim against the Owner of the Vessel who has failed to pay Plaintiff’s claim. The Vessel is within Indian territorial waters. For security and recovery of the Plaintiff’s claim, the Plaintiff is desirous to arrest and detain the Vessel under The Admiralty Act, 2017. This is a precedent of Admiralty suit in respect of maritime claim to be filed before the concerned High Court for arrest and detention of ship and monetary claim.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT CHALLENGING THE TERMINATION AND SEEKING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The Parties had entered into an Agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit by aggrieved party challenging the termination and seeking specific performance of the Agreement and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BY DAUGHTER CLAIMING SHARE IN FATHER’S HUF AND PARTITION OF HUF PROPERTIES
The Daughter is claiming share in properties of father’s Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Daughter claiming share in Father’s HUF and portion of HUF properties.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS COMMITTED ACTS CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 108 (o) OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 AS ALSO OF 16(1) (a) AND 16(1) (b) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court for recovery of possession on the ground that the Tenant has committed any act contrary to the provisions of clause (o) of section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in violation of 16(1) (a), 16(1) (b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 by damaging the suit premises and carrying out structural changes of a permanent nature.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
A person was maliciously prosecuted and prosecution against him/her failed. This is a precedent of Suit for damages for Malicious Prosecution.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BASED ON PERSONALITY RIGHTS
The Plaintiff is a Celebrity having personality rights. The Defendant is wrongfully attempting to use Plaintiff’s name and other personality rights without the consent of the Plaintiff for commercial gain. This is a precedent of suit based on personality rights for an injunction and consequential reliefs.
₹875 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT CHALLENGING THE REGISTERED GIFT DEED OF AN IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
A person desires to challenge the registered Gift Deed of an immovable property. This is a precedent of suit challenging the registered Gift Deed of an immovable property.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR REDEMPTION OF MORTGAGE
The property is mortgaged. The Mortgagor desires to redeem the mortgaged property through Court. This is a precedent of suit for Redemption of Mortgage.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL SUIT TO RECOVER MONEY (NOT A SUMMARY SUIT)
This is a precedent of Regular Civil Suit to recover money from the Defendant (Not a Summary Suit).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
INTERPLEADER SUIT
When two or more persons claim adversely to one another the same amount or property from another person who claims no in interest in the same save and except for his cost/charges. For the purpose of obtaining a decision as to whom the payment should be made or property should be delivered, he needs to file an Interpleader Suit before the appropriate court. This is the precedent of an interpleader suit.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.