Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
₹700 (30% OFF)
“The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.”
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
TRANSFER PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FOR TRANSFER OF PETITION (MATRIMONIAL)
This is the precedent of Transfer Petition (Matrimonial) to be filed before the Supreme CourT of India for transfer of Matrimonial cases from the court of one state to the court of another state. This is under the provisions of Section 25 of CPC read with Supreme Court Rules.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII (4) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with averments to prove document u/s. 65 (B) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 along with requisite Certificate also with averment to prove documents by Secondary evidence.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 80 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The Plaintiff desires to file a Civil Suit against the Government or against a Public Officer purporting to act in his official capacity. However, in such a case the Plaintiff is required to serve in advance a Statutory Notice under Section 80 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to the concerned Government/Government Departments/ Public Officer. This is a precedent of Notice under Section 80 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
₹210 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certain orders passed in a suit before its final decision as provided under Section 104 read with Order 43, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT BASED ON DISHONOURED CHEQUES
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 for recovery of the amount based on the dishonoured cheques.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DECLARING A PERSON WHO IS NOT TRACEABLE AS DEAD AND FOR SEEKING DIRECTION AGAINST THE CONCERNED AUTHORITY TO ISSUE HIS/HER DEATH CERTIFICATE
A person is missing for over a period of seven years and his whereabouts are not known in spite of efforts by the family and the Police Authorities. This is the precedent of a suit for declaration that missing person is presumed to have died and asking the authorities to issue Death Certificate of such a missing person.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED IN APPEAL COURT SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT/APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER RERA CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
The Decree/Judgment passed by any Appellate Civil Court in the appeal which Court is sub ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a Second Appeal before the High Court. This is a precedent of Second Appeal to High Court under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This precedent will be also helpful for an Appeal to High Court under Section 58 of The Real Estate (Regulation and Development Act, 2016 (RERA).
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR MONEY LENT AND ADVANCED
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of money lent and advanced.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 260 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
The Income Tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) has made an Order against the Assessee. The Assessee wants to further challenge the said Order before the Hon’ble High Court. This is the precedent of an Appeal to the High Court against the Order of ITAT under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.