Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
₹350 (30% OFF)
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COMPANY PETITION FOR OPPRESSION AND MIS MANAGEMENT
The Petitioners are minority shareholders. The Respondents are managing the Company to their benefit and detrimental to the interest of the Company and the Shareholders. The conduct of the Respondents is oppressive. This is the precedent of Company Petition for oppression and mismanagement to be preferred before NCLT.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR CONDONING THE DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT)
This is a precedent for Miscellaneous Application for Condoning the delay in filing the Appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY THE FINANCIAL CREDITOR TO INITIATE CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER SECTION 7 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 READ WITH RULE 4 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016.
The Financial Creditors are not paid by the Company and they need to commence Insolvency Resolution Process against the Company. This is the standard precedent of an Application by the Financial Creditor to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 4 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY WAY OF COMPANY PETITION/APPEAL FOR RESTORATION OF THE NAME OF THE COMPANY WHICH WAS STRUCK OFF BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
The Company defaulted in filing statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies. Therefore, the Registrar of Companies have struck off the name of the Company from the list of Register of Companies. Now remedy is to approach NCLT. This is the precedent of an Application by way of Company Petition/Appeal for restoration of the name of the Company which was struck off by the Registrar of Companies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION BY A THIRD PARTY TO INTERVENE IN PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 9 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY, CODE 2016 FOR SAFEGUARDING ITS INTEREST AND FOR BEING IMPLEADED AS PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS
The Application under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed before NCLT. A third party desires to intervene in the said proceedings to safeguard its interest and desires to join in the said proceedings as party Respondent. This is the precedent of Miscellaneous Application to be filed before NCLT in the said proceedings to intervene and safeguard the rights of the Applicant/Intervener.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
ARBITRATION PETITION UNDER SECTION 11 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR BEFORE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA/FOREIGN ARBITRATION
This is the precedent of a Petition under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to be filed before the Supreme Court of India in respect of an International Commercial Arbitration which empowers the court to examine the existence of an Arbitration Agreement while deciding the Application for Appointment of an Arbitrator.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO BE FILED BEFORE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL TO PLACE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ON BOARD FOR URGENT HEARING
The Petition and/or Miscellaneous Application is not reaching for hearing before NCLT and /or one desires to place it on board before the appropriate bench of NCLT for urgent hearing-orders. This is the precedent of an interlocutory application for the same.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.