Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
₹525 (30% OFF)
The immovable property of a third party is attached in execution of a decree of the Court. This is a precedent of an application for raising Warrant of Attachment of immovable property under Order 21 Rule 54 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION U/S 6 OF SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963
A person is forcibly dispossessed from the property without process of law. This is a precedent of suit for Recovery of Possession under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DECLARING A PERSON WHO IS NOT TRACEABLE AS DEAD AND FOR SEEKING DIRECTION AGAINST THE CONCERNED AUTHORITY TO ISSUE HIS/HER DEATH CERTIFICATE
A person is missing for over a period of seven years and his whereabouts are not known in spite of efforts by the family and the Police Authorities. This is the precedent of a suit for declaration that missing person is presumed to have died and asking the authorities to issue Death Certificate of such a missing person.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT CHALLENGING THE TERMINATION AND SEEKING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The Parties had entered into an Agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit by aggrieved party challenging the termination and seeking specific performance of the Agreement and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT ON TITLE FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY AND FOR POSSESSION
Your Ownership right to the property are disputed. This is a precedent of Suit on Title for a declaration that the Plaintiffs are the owners of property and for possession and also for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT BASED ON DISHONOURED CHEQUES
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 for recovery of the amount based on the dishonoured cheques.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII (4) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with averments to prove document u/s. 65 (B) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 along with requisite Certificate also with averment to prove documents by Secondary evidence.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL SUIT TO RECOVER MONEY (NOT A SUMMARY SUIT)
This is a precedent of Regular Civil Suit to recover money from the Defendant (Not a Summary Suit).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
STANDARD DEFENCES TO BE RAISED IN THE WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE PLAINT (CIVIL SUIT)
Download Civil Suit Formats Online. The Plaintiff/s has/have filed the Civil Suit against the Defendant/s. These are the standard defenses normally adopted by the Defendant/s in the Written Statement/Reply.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BASED ON PERSONALITY RIGHTS
The Plaintiff is a Celebrity having personality rights. The Defendant is wrongfully attempting to use Plaintiff’s name and other personality rights without the consent of the Plaintiff for commercial gain. This is a precedent of suit based on personality rights for an injunction and consequential reliefs.
₹875 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Defendant is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. This is the precedent of a suit for public nuisance restraining the Defendant/s from causing and continuing to cause such nuisance.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.