Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
SUIT FOR DECLARATION THAT PURPORTED AGREEMENT IS VOID AND, IN ANY EVENT, THE SAME IS VALIDLY TERMINATED
₹1000 ₹700 (30% OFF)
The Parties have entered into an Agreement. One of the parties is contending that the Agreement is void and, in any event, the same is terminated. This is a precedent of suit for declaration that purported Agreement is void and, in any event, the same is validly terminated.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

SUIT FOR DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
A person was maliciously prosecuted and prosecution against him/her failed. This is a precedent of Suit for damages for Malicious Prosecution.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE AGREEMENT STANDS VALIDLY TERMINATED
The Parties had entered into an agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit for a declaration that Agreement is validly terminated and for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT BY DAUGHTER CLAIMING SHARE IN FATHER’S HUF AND PARTITION OF HUF PROPERTIES
The Daughter is claiming share in properties of father’s Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Daughter claiming share in Father’s HUF and portion of HUF properties.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII (4) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with averments to prove document u/s. 65 (B) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 along with requisite Certificate also with averment to prove documents by Secondary evidence.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF THE REMAINING PRICE OF GOODS ORDERED WHEN DELIVERY NOT ACCEPTED
The Purchaser of the goods, though made part advance payment, has refused to accept the delivery of goods. This is a precedent of a Suit for recovery of the remaining price of goods ordered but delivery not accepted and for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR DEFAMATION AND INJUNCTION AGAINST NEWS PAPER COMPANY, JOURNALIST AND EDITOR
The defamatory statements are published in news paper. This is a precedent of a suit for defamation and injunction and for consequential reliefs against the news paper company, journalist and editor.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE
The Defendants have availed financial facility from the Plaintiff against the Mortgage of their property. The Defendants have failed to pay the mortgage debt to the Plaintiff. The Defendants have failed to redeem the Mortgage. The Plaintiff claims to be entitled to foreclosure the mortgage and become the Owner of the mortgaged property. This is the precedent of a suit for foreclosure of mortgage.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT BASED ON PERSONALITY RIGHTS
The Plaintiff is a Celebrity having personality rights. The Defendant is wrongfully attempting to use Plaintiff’s name and other personality rights without the consent of the Plaintiff for commercial gain. This is a precedent of suit based on personality rights for an injunction and consequential reliefs.
₹1250₹875 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The immovable property of a third party is attached in execution of a decree of the Court. This is a precedent of an application for raising Warrant of Attachment of immovable property under Order 21 Rule 54 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT BY A CO-PARCENER FOR PARTITION OF HUF AND ACCOUNTS
The disputes have arisen amongst the Co-parceners/ Members of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Co-parcener for Partition of HUF and accounts.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT ON TITLE FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY AND FOR POSSESSION
Your Ownership right to the property are disputed. This is a precedent of Suit on Title for a declaration that the Plaintiffs are the owners of property and for possession and also for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.