Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
SUIT FOR REDEMPTION OF MORTGAGE
₹700 (30% OFF)
The property is mortgaged. The Mortgagor desires to redeem the mortgaged property through Court. This is a precedent of suit for Redemption of Mortgage.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR PARTITION OF AN IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
The immovable property is owned by several Co-Owners. Some of the Co-owners desire to Partition the property. This is a precedent of Suit for Partition of an immovable property.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM AND FOR IT’S ACCOUNTS
A Partnership Firm is dissolved by notice or otherwise. This is a precedent of Suit for Dissolution of a Partnership Firm, for accounts and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR EXECUTION OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT/DECREE PASSED BY A NON-RECIPROCATING COUNTRY
A foreign Judgment/Decree is passed by a Non-Reciprocating Country against Indian Party who desires to execute the foreign Judgment in India. This is a precedent of suit for execution of a foreign Judgment/Decree passed by Non Reciprocating Country.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL SUIT TO RECOVER MONEY (NOT A SUMMARY SUIT)
This is a precedent of Regular Civil Suit to recover money from the Defendant (Not a Summary Suit).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BY A CO-PARCENER FOR PARTITION OF HUF AND ACCOUNTS
The disputes have arisen amongst the Co-parceners/ Members of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Co-parcener for Partition of HUF and accounts.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PLAINTIFF FROM THE PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
A person apprehends he will be dispossessed from the property without following the due process of law. This is a precedent of Suit for an Injunction from Dispossessing the Plaintiff from the property without due process of law.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF THE REMAINING PRICE OF GOODS ORDERED WHEN DELIVERY NOT ACCEPTED
The Purchaser of the goods, though made part advance payment, has refused to accept the delivery of goods. This is a precedent of a Suit for recovery of the remaining price of goods ordered but delivery not accepted and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE
The Defendants have availed financial facility from the Plaintiff against the Mortgage of their property. The Defendants have failed to pay the mortgage debt to the Plaintiff. The Defendants have failed to redeem the Mortgage. The Plaintiff claims to be entitled to foreclosure the mortgage and become the Owner of the mortgaged property. This is the precedent of a suit for foreclosure of mortgage.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The immovable property of a third party is attached in execution of a decree of the Court. This is a precedent of an application for raising Warrant of Attachment of immovable property under Order 21 Rule 54 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION U/S 6 OF SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963
A person is forcibly dispossessed from the property without process of law. This is a precedent of suit for Recovery of Possession under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII (4) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with averments to prove document u/s. 65 (B) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 along with requisite Certificate also with averment to prove documents by Secondary evidence.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.