Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale! 
SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
₹700.00 (30% OFF)
The parties have entered into an Agreement. The disputes have arisen. This is a precedent of Suit for Specific
Performance.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
A person was maliciously prosecuted and prosecution against him/her failed. This is a precedent of Suit for damages for Malicious Prosecution.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INTERPLEADER SUIT
When two or more persons claim adversely to one another the same amount or property from another person who claims no in interest in the same save and except for his cost/charges. For the purpose of obtaining a decision as to whom the payment should be made or property should be delivered, he needs to file an Interpleader Suit before the appropriate court. This is the precedent of an interpleader suit.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
STANDARD DEFENCES TO BE RAISED IN THE WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE PLAINT (CIVIL SUIT)
Download Civil Suit Formats Online. The Plaintiff/s has/have filed the Civil Suit against the Defendant/s. These are the standard defenses normally adopted by the Defendant/s in the Written Statement/Reply.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DEFAMATION AND INJUNCTION AGAINST NEWS PAPER COMPANY, JOURNALIST AND EDITOR
The defamatory statements are published in news paper. This is a precedent of a suit for defamation and injunction and for consequential reliefs against the news paper company, journalist and editor.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR MONEY LENT AND ADVANCED
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of money lent and advanced.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE AGREEMENT STANDS VALIDLY TERMINATED
The Parties had entered into an agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit for a declaration that Agreement is validly terminated and for consequential reliefs.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT CHALLENGING THE TERMINATION AND SEEKING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The Parties had entered into an Agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit by aggrieved party challenging the termination and seeking specific performance of the Agreement and for consequential reliefs.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE
The Defendants have availed financial facility from the Plaintiff against the Mortgage of their property. The Defendants have failed to pay the mortgage debt to the Plaintiff. The Defendants have failed to redeem the Mortgage. The Plaintiff claims to be entitled to foreclosure the mortgage and become the Owner of the mortgaged property. This is the precedent of a suit for foreclosure of mortgage.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM AND FOR IT’S ACCOUNTS
A Partnership Firm is dissolved by notice or otherwise. This is a precedent of Suit for Dissolution of a Partnership Firm, for accounts and for consequential reliefs.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The immovable property of a third party is attached in execution of a decree of the Court. This is a precedent of an application for raising Warrant of Attachment of immovable property under Order 21 Rule 54 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR EXECUTION OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT/DECREE PASSED BY A NON-RECIPROCATING COUNTRY
A foreign Judgment/Decree is passed by a Non-Reciprocating Country against Indian Party who desires to execute the foreign Judgment in India. This is a precedent of suit for execution of a foreign Judgment/Decree passed by Non Reciprocating Country.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.