Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993 TO RECOVER DEBT
This is a precedent of an Application by Banks/Financial Institutions under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to recover debt before Debt Recovery Tribunal. In this case systematic fraud is play upon the Applicant.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
REPLY UNDER SECTION 13 (3A) OF SARFAESI, 2002 OF THE BORROWER/GUARANTORS TO STATUTORY NOTICE OF BANK/FINANCIAL INSTITUTION UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002
This is a precedent of reply under Section 13 (3A) of Sarfaesi, 2002 of the Borrower/Guarantors to statutory notice of Bank/Financial Institution under Section 13 (2) of Sarfaesi, 2002
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 20 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBT DUE TO BANK AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate F153Tribunal challenging the Order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 BY A THIRD PARTY WHO IS NEITHER BORROWER NOR GUARANTOR
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a Notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same against the property of a third party who is neither a borrower nor a guarantor nor in any manner responsible to Bank/ Financial Institution. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 by a third party to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION TO THE RECOVERY OFFICER OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL FOR RAISING THE ATTACHMENT LEVIED ON THIRD PARTY’S PROPERTY
This is a precedent of an Application to the Recovery Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal for raising the attachment levied on Third Party’s property.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
RERA – APPEAL TO APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF MEMBER/ADJUDICATING OFFICER
This is a precedent of an Appeal to be filed before The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal against the Order of member/adjudicating officer under the provisions of The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA).
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION TO CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE OR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/ SECURED CREDITOR U/S. 14 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF TAKING POSSESSION/FORCIBLE POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF THE SECURED ASSET
This is a precedent of an Application to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate by Banks/Financial Institutions/Secured Creditor u/s. 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for the purpose of taking possession/forcible possession or control of the Secured Asset. The Bank/Financial Institution/ Secured Creditor has become entitled to the possession of the Secured Asset under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, however, the Borrower is not co-operating.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.