Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
AN APPLICATION BY A THIRD PARTY TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL FOR VACATING AN INJUNCTION ORDER PASSED AGAINST HIS PROPERTY FOR THE DEBT OF THE BORROWER
This is a precedent of an Application by a third party to Debt Recovery Tribunal for vacating an injunction order passed against his property for recovery of Debt of Borrowers/Guarantors.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (i) THE TENANT HAS UNLAWFULLY SUB-LET OR GIVEN ON LICENSE THE PREMISES UNDER SECTION 16(1)(e) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND (ii) THE PREMISES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE IMMEDIATE PURPOSE OF DEMOLITION ORDERED BY ANY MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OR OTHER COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 16(1)(k) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999.
This is a precedent of an eviction suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court or before the court of civil judge for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises on the grounds that the Tenant has unlawfully sublet or given on license the premises as contemplated under section 16(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and further that the said premises are required by the landlord for immediate demolition as ordered by the concerned authority under section 16(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 .
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT BASED ON DISHONOURED CHEQUES
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 for recovery of the amount based on the dishonoured cheques.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993 TO RECOVER DEBT
This is a precedent of an Application by Banks/Financial Institutions under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to recover debt before Debt Recovery Tribunal. In this case systematic fraud is play upon the Applicant.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certain orders passed in a suit before its final decision as provided under Section 104 read with Order 43, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 20 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBT DUE TO BANK AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate F153Tribunal challenging the Order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
REVIEW PETITION TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT
This is the precedent of Review Petition to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court for reviewing its own order and judgment. The Review Petition can be filed only if the grounds for Review are available.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.