Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
AN APPLICATION TO CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE OR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/ SECURED CREDITOR U/S. 14 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF TAKING POSSESSION/FORCIBLE POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF THE SECURED ASSET
₹750 ₹525 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an Application to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate by Banks/Financial Institutions/Secured Creditor u/s. 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for the purpose of taking possession/forcible possession or control of the Secured Asset. The Bank/Financial Institution/ Secured Creditor has become entitled to the possession of the Secured Asset under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, however, the Borrower is not co-operating.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
This is the precedent of an application for Anticipatory Bail before the sessions court U/s. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to seek protection from an arrest on the basis of FIR registered.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF A PRIVATE COMPLAINT FOR COMPOUNDABLE OFFENCES
The parties have settle the dispute in a private complaint involving compoundable offences. This is the precedent of an application for withdrawal of a private complaint for compoundable offences.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE FOR QUASHING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES)
This is the precedent of Writ petition for quashing of First Information Report (FIR) to the High Court by consent of the parties.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993 TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
This is a precedent of an Application by Banks/Financial Institutions under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to recover debt before Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993 TO RECOVER DEBT
This is a precedent of an Application by Banks/Financial Institutions under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to recover debt before Debt Recovery Tribunal. In this case systematic fraud is play upon the Applicant.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR DISPENSING WITH THE CONDITION IMPOSED WHILE GRANTING ANTICIPATORY BAIL
The Conditions are imposed while granting Anticipatory Bail (ABA). The Applicant wants to apply to the Court for dispensing with the conditions. This is the precedent for the same.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 397 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT U/S. 102 OF THE SAID CODE REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE BANK ACCOUNTS
The Magistrate's court has refused to de-freeze Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Session's court. This is the precedent of Revision Application before the Session Court U/S. 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the order of the Magistrate's Court U/s. 102 of the said code refusing to de-freeze Bank Account
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
The Magistrate's court and also Session's court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session's court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR DE-FREEZING/UNFREEZING OF BANK ACCOUNT FREEZE BY INVESTIGATING AGENCY.
The Bank Accounts/properties of the Accused are freeze by the Investigating Agency. This is a precedent of an Application for de-freezing/unfreezing of Bank Account freeze by Investigating Agency.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION SEEKING PERMISSION/LEAVE TO TRAVEL ABROAD WHILE ON BAIL
While allowing the Bail Application, it is practiced to impose condition upon the Applicant not to travel outside India without permission of the Court. This is a precedent of an Application to obtain permission from the Court to travel abroad.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.