Customers' review
1 review for COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may write a review.
Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
₹420.00 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TITLE OF THE FILM (TRADE MARK)
The plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The plaintiff’s application for registration of the trademark being the title of the film is pending. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on plaintiff’s title and pass off his film as the plaintiff’s film or remake of the plaintiff’s film or in any kind encashing the plaintiff’s goodwill. This is the suit for restraining the defended from doing so and for consequential reliefs.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN THE RELEASED FILM
The precedent of a Notice for infringing copyright in the Film. The Producers are the Owners of copyright in the already released Cinematographic Film. Someone is by making a new film infringing the copyright of the said released film.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
REPLY UNDER SECTION 13 (3A) OF SARFAESI, 2002 OF THE BORROWER/GUARANTORS TO STATUTORY NOTICE OF BANK/FINANCIAL INSTITUTION UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002
This is a precedent of reply under Section 13 (3A) of Sarfaesi, 2002 of the Borrower/Guarantors to statutory notice of Bank/Financial Institution under Section 13 (2) of Sarfaesi, 2002
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A TRADE MARK
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Mark Journal before it gets registered. This is the precedent of Notice of Opposition (TM-O) to be filed by the Party who wishes to oppose the registration of the advertised Trade Mark.
₹420.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OF THE TRADEMARKED DESIGN
This is the precedent of suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from doing so and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark which consist of unique design. The Defendant is using the said design in infringement of Plaintiff’s registered trademark.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT
This is the precedent of the plaint for restraining the defendant from infringing the plaintiff’s registered patent and for consequential reliefs. The plaintiff is the registered owner of the patent. The defendant is attempting to infringe the same.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TRADEMARK
The Plaintiff is a leading global provider of Computer Software and Online Services. The Defendant is attempting to use popular mark/trade mark of the Plaintiff for the similar services. This is the precedent of a suit restraining the Defendant from using the said mark and from passing of its services as of Plaintiffs are for consequential reliefs.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
These are the precedents of notice for dissolution of a partnership firm at will and subsequent public notice. The Partnership/Partnership Firm is at will and a partner desires to dissolve the same.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
REPLY TO OBJECTIONS RAISED IN EXAMINATION REPORT OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS TO THE TRADE MARK APPLICATION
The Application for registration of a trade mark is submitted to the Trade Mark Registry. Upon scrutiny, the Trade Mark Office has raised certain objections by preparing Examination Report and which examination report is required to be dealt with. This is a precedent of the standard reply to the examination report of The Registrar of Trade Marks.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN DESIGN
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the copyright in the design. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart
0
Great