Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
₹420 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
NOTICE TO BORROWERS AND THE GUARANTORS UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002 BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
This is a precedent of notice by the Banks/Financial Institutions to the Borrower and the guarantors under Section 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
ASSIGNMENT OF TRADEMARK
This is a precedent of an agreement for assignment of registered Trade Mark by the Owner/Proprietor of Trade Mark to a third party.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN THE RELEASED FILM
The precedent of a Notice for infringing copyright in the Film. The Producers are the Owners of copyright in the already released Cinematographic Film. Someone is by making a new film infringing the copyright of the said released film.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
INVOCATION NOTICE UNDER ARBTIRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR
Disputes have arose between the Parties and the Agreement between them provides for referring the same to Arbitration. This is the precedent of Invocation Notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator/s to arbitrate dispute between the Parties as per the written contract.
₹245 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTRATION OF DESIGN
The Petition is filed before the Controller of Patents and Designs for Cancellation of the registration of Design under the Design Act, 2000. This is a precedent of Counter Statement (Reply) to the Petition for the Cancellation of the registered Design.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
This is a precedent of Trade Mark License Agreement whereby the Owner and Proprietor of registered Trade Marks is giving license to use the Trade Marks on the agreed terms.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
REPLY TO OBJECTIONS RAISED IN EXAMINATION REPORT OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS TO THE TRADE MARK APPLICATION
The Application for registration of a trade mark is submitted to the Trade Mark Registry. Upon scrutiny, the Trade Mark Office has raised certain objections by preparing Examination Report and which examination report is required to be dealt with. This is a precedent of the standard reply to the examination report of The Registrar of Trade Marks.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESIONS COURT AGAINST THE ORDER OF ISSUANCE OF PROCESS BY METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE’S COURT
This is a precedent of Criminal Revision Application to be filed before the Sessions Court challenging the Order for issuance of the process by the Magistrate Court under Section 138 or Sections 138 read with 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
REPLY UNDER SECTION 13 (3A) OF SARFAESI, 2002 OF THE BORROWER/GUARANTORS TO STATUTORY NOTICE OF BANK/FINANCIAL INSTITUTION UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002
This is a precedent of reply under Section 13 (3A) of Sarfaesi, 2002 of the Borrower/Guarantors to statutory notice of Bank/Financial Institution under Section 13 (2) of Sarfaesi, 2002
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT
This is the precedent of the plaint for restraining the defendant from infringing the plaintiff’s registered patent and for consequential reliefs. The plaintiff is the registered owner of the patent. The defendant is attempting to infringe the same.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.