Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale!
REPLY TO OBJECTIONS RAISED IN EXAMINATION REPORT OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS TO THE TRADE MARK APPLICATION
₹350 (30% OFF)
The Application for registration of a trade mark is submitted to the Trade Mark Registry. Upon scrutiny, the Trade Mark Office has raised certain objections by preparing Examination Report and which examination report is required to be dealt with. This is a precedent of the standard reply to the examination report of The Registrar of Trade Marks.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN DESIGN
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the copyright in the design. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CEASE AND DESIST NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARK, BEING THE TITLE OF THE CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM
This is the precedent of a Cease and desist Notice for infringement of the trademark being the title of the feature film. The producers are the registered proprietor of the trade mark being the title of the film. Someone is in infringement of the Producers’ proprietary right in the said title making a film with the same title.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF DEVICE MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Device Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARK
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Journal, Notice of Opposition and Counter Statement to Notice of Opposition are filed. This is the precedent of Affidavit of Evidence in support of opposition to be filed by the party who is opposing the registration of the Trade Mark.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF WORD MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Word Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A TRADE MARK
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Mark Journal before it gets registered. This is the precedent of Notice of Opposition (TM-O) to be filed by the Party who wishes to oppose the registration of the advertised Trade Mark.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF THE TRADEMARKED TITLE OF THE FILM
This is the precedent of suit/plaint restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from releasing the cinematographic film with the said title and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on the plaintiff’s registered trademark title.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS IN THE NOVEL/BOOK FOR PRODUCTION OF A CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM
The author of a novel desires to assign the rights in the novel/book for making a cinematographic film based on the said novel. This is a precedent of an assignment of rights in the novel/book for making of a cinematographic film.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TITLE OF THE FILM (TRADE MARK)
The plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The plaintiff’s application for registration of the trademark being the title of the film is pending. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on plaintiff’s title and pass off his film as the plaintiff’s film or remake of the plaintiff’s film or in any kind encashing the plaintiff’s goodwill. This is the suit for restraining the defended from doing so and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTRATION OF DESIGN
The Petition is filed before the Controller of Patents and Designs for Cancellation of the registration of Design under the Design Act, 2000. This is a precedent of Counter Statement (Reply) to the Petition for the Cancellation of the registered Design.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.