Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A TRADE MARK
₹600 ₹420 (30% OFF)
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Mark Journal before it gets registered. This is the precedent of Notice of Opposition (TM-O) to be filed by the Party who wishes to oppose the registration of the advertised Trade Mark.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

APPLICATION TO THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK FROM THE TRADE MARK REGISTER /APPLICATION FOR RECTIFICATION OF THE TRADE MARK REGISTER
The Trade Mark is already registered and exists on the trade mark register of the Trade Mark Registry. One wishes to challenge the said registration of trade mark and desires to remove the same from the Trade Mark Register. The civil suit between the parties of infringement/passing off is also pending. This is a precedent of an application to be made to Intellectual Property Appellate Board along with affidavit of an evidence for removal of the trade mark from the register and/or rectification of the register.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF DEVICE MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Device Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹350₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN THE RELEASED FILM
The precedent of a Notice for infringing copyright in the Film. The Producers are the Owners of copyright in the already released Cinematographic Film. Someone is by making a new film infringing the copyright of the said released film.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

ASSIGNMENT OF TRADEMARKS ALONG WITH THE BENEFIT OF APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS
This is a precedent of an agreement for assignment of Trade Marks along with the benefit of pending applications for registration of Trade Marks.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTERED DESIGN
A particular design is registered under the Designs Act, 2000 and rules framed thereunder. The Applicant desires to challenge the same. These are the precedents of a petition for cancellation of the registered design along with Statement of facts and affidavit of evidence in support of the Petition.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TRADEMARK
The Plaintiff is a leading global provider of Computer Software and Online Services. The Defendant is attempting to use popular mark/trade mark of the Plaintiff for the similar services. This is the precedent of a suit restraining the Defendant from using the said mark and from passing of its services as of Plaintiffs are for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

COUNTER STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTRATION OF DESIGN
The Petition is filed before the Controller of Patents and Designs for Cancellation of the registration of Design under the Design Act, 2000. This is a precedent of Counter Statement (Reply) to the Petition for the Cancellation of the registered Design.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹600₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TITLE OF THE FILM (TRADE MARK)
The plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The plaintiff’s application for registration of the trademark being the title of the film is pending. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on plaintiff’s title and pass off his film as the plaintiff’s film or remake of the plaintiff’s film or in any kind encashing the plaintiff’s goodwill. This is the suit for restraining the defended from doing so and for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF THE TRADEMARKED TITLE OF THE FILM
This is the precedent of suit/plaint restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from releasing the cinematographic film with the said title and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on the plaintiff’s registered trademark title.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.