Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale!
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A TRADE MARK
₹420 (30% OFF)
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Mark Journal before it gets registered. This is the precedent of Notice of Opposition (TM-O) to be filed by the Party who wishes to oppose the registration of the advertised Trade Mark.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN DESIGN
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the copyright in the design. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CEASE AND DESIST NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARK, BEING THE TITLE OF THE CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM
This is the precedent of a Cease and desist Notice for infringement of the trademark being the title of the feature film. The producers are the registered proprietor of the trade mark being the title of the film. Someone is in infringement of the Producers’ proprietary right in the said title making a film with the same title.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO RETIRE FROM A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
These are the precedents of notice of intention to retire from a partnership firm in terms of the Partnership Deed and subsequent public notice to be published upon retirement.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF THE TRADEMARKED TITLE OF THE FILM
This is the precedent of suit/plaint restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from releasing the cinematographic film with the said title and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on the plaintiff’s registered trademark title.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
REPLY TO OBJECTIONS RAISED IN EXAMINATION REPORT OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS TO THE TRADE MARK APPLICATION
The Application for registration of a trade mark is submitted to the Trade Mark Registry. Upon scrutiny, the Trade Mark Office has raised certain objections by preparing Examination Report and which examination report is required to be dealt with. This is a precedent of the standard reply to the examination report of The Registrar of Trade Marks.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
ASSIGNMENT OF TRADEMARKS ALONG WITH THE BENEFIT OF APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS
This is a precedent of an agreement for assignment of Trade Marks along with the benefit of pending applications for registration of Trade Marks.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN THE RELEASED FILM
The precedent of a Notice for infringing copyright in the Film. The Producers are the Owners of copyright in the already released Cinematographic Film. Someone is by making a new film infringing the copyright of the said released film.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PREVENTION OF MISUSE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION/DATA/TRADE SECRETS
This is the suit for Prevention of misuse of Confidential Information/Data/Trade Secrets. The Defendant being an ex-employee of the Plaintiff is attempting or misusing confidential information, data and trade secrets of the Plaintiff.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTERED DESIGN
A particular design is registered under the Designs Act, 2000 and rules framed thereunder. The Applicant desires to challenge the same. These are the precedents of a petition for cancellation of the registered design along with Statement of facts and affidavit of evidence in support of the Petition.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.