Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A TRADE MARK
₹600 ₹420 (30% OFF)
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Mark Journal before it gets registered. This is the precedent of Notice of Opposition (TM-O) to be filed by the Party who wishes to oppose the registration of the advertised Trade Mark.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of an Affidavit of Evidence in support of the Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹600₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

REPLY UNDER SECTION 13 (3A) OF SARFAESI, 2002 OF THE BORROWER/GUARANTORS TO STATUTORY NOTICE OF BANK/FINANCIAL INSTITUTION UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002
This is a precedent of reply under Section 13 (3A) of Sarfaesi, 2002 of the Borrower/Guarantors to statutory notice of Bank/Financial Institution under Section 13 (2) of Sarfaesi, 2002
Rated 5.00 out of 5₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

CEASE AND DESIST NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARK, BEING THE TITLE OF THE CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM
This is the precedent of a Cease and desist Notice for infringement of the trademark being the title of the feature film. The producers are the registered proprietor of the trade mark being the title of the film. Someone is in infringement of the Producers’ proprietary right in the said title making a film with the same title.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF THE TRADEMARKED TITLE OF THE FILM
This is the precedent of suit/plaint restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from releasing the cinematographic film with the said title and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on the plaintiff’s registered trademark title.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

ASSIGNMENT OF TRADEMARKS ALONG WITH THE BENEFIT OF APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS
This is a precedent of an agreement for assignment of Trade Marks along with the benefit of pending applications for registration of Trade Marks.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

REPLY TO OBJECTIONS RAISED IN EXAMINATION REPORT OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS TO THE TRADE MARK APPLICATION
The Application for registration of a trade mark is submitted to the Trade Mark Registry. Upon scrutiny, the Trade Mark Office has raised certain objections by preparing Examination Report and which examination report is required to be dealt with. This is a precedent of the standard reply to the examination report of The Registrar of Trade Marks.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN THE RELEASED FILM
The precedent of a Notice for infringing copyright in the Film. The Producers are the Owners of copyright in the already released Cinematographic Film. Someone is by making a new film infringing the copyright of the said released film.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARKS, COPYRIGHT AND PASSING OFF (COMPOSITE ACTION)
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for infringement of Trademarks, copyright and passing off (Composite Action) to restrain the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark, copyright and pass off the Plaintiff’s goods as of Defendant and for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT
This is the precedent of the plaint for restraining the defendant from infringing the plaintiff’s registered patent and for consequential reliefs. The plaintiff is the registered owner of the patent. The defendant is attempting to infringe the same.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

COUNTER STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTRATION OF DESIGN
The Petition is filed before the Controller of Patents and Designs for Cancellation of the registration of Design under the Design Act, 2000. This is a precedent of Counter Statement (Reply) to the Petition for the Cancellation of the registered Design.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TRADEMARK
The Plaintiff is a leading global provider of Computer Software and Online Services. The Defendant is attempting to use popular mark/trade mark of the Plaintiff for the similar services. This is the precedent of a suit restraining the Defendant from using the said mark and from passing of its services as of Plaintiffs are for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

INVOCATION NOTICE UNDER ARBTIRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR
Disputes have arose between the Parties and the Agreement between them provides for referring the same to Arbitration. This is the precedent of Invocation Notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator/s to arbitrate dispute between the Parties as per the written contract.
₹350₹245 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.