Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 80 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
₹210 (30% OFF)
The Plaintiff desires to file a Civil Suit against the Government or against a Public Officer purporting to act in his official capacity. However, in such a case the Plaintiff is required to serve in advance a Statutory Notice under Section 80 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to the concerned Government/Government Departments/ Public Officer. This is a precedent of Notice under Section 80 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR THE AMOUNTS DUE FOR GOODS SOLD AND DELIVERED
This is the precedent of Notice of Demand in respect of the amounts due and payable for the goods sold and delivered.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE TO BANK FOR DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS AND CLAIMING THE DAMAGES
The Bank has wrongly caused to publish your name as defaulter in repayment of loan/financial facility. This is the precedent of notice to the Bank for making defamatory statements and claiming damages.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII Rule 4 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE TO NEWS CHANNEL FOR TELECASTING DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS/DEFAMATORY NEWS
The TV/Satellite Channel has wrongly telecasted news damaging your reputation amounting to defamatory statements. This is the precedent of notice to the TV/Satellite Channel inter alia requiring them to stop telecasting such news and seeking source of such news.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Defendant is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. This is the precedent of a suit for public nuisance restraining the Defendant/s from causing and continuing to cause such nuisance.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
REPLY UNDER SECTION 13 (3A) OF SARFAESI, 2002 OF THE BORROWER/GUARANTORS TO STATUTORY NOTICE OF BANK/FINANCIAL INSTITUTION UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002
This is a precedent of reply under Section 13 (3A) of Sarfaesi, 2002 of the Borrower/Guarantors to statutory notice of Bank/Financial Institution under Section 13 (2) of Sarfaesi, 2002
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
These are the precedents of notice for dissolution of a partnership firm at will and subsequent public notice. The Partnership/Partnership Firm is at will and a partner desires to dissolve the same.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO RETIRE FROM A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
These are the precedents of notice of intention to retire from a partnership firm in terms of the Partnership Deed and subsequent public notice to be published upon retirement.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII (4) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with averments to prove document u/s. 65 (B) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 along with requisite Certificate also with averment to prove documents by Secondary evidence.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED IN APPEAL COURT SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT/APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER RERAÂ CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF AÂ SECOND APPEALÂ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
The Decree/Judgment passed by any Appellate Civil Court in the appeal which Court is sub ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a Second Appeal before the High Court. This is a precedent of Second Appeal to High Court under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This precedent will be also helpful for an Appeal to High Court under Section 58 of The Real Estate (Regulation and Development Act, 2016 (RERA).
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.