Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
₹525 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
ARBITRATION APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 11 TO THE HON’BLE COURT FOR APPOINTMENT OF AN ARBITRATOR
This is the precedent of an Application under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 which empowers the Court to examine the existence of an Arbitration Agreement while deciding the Application for Appointment of an Arbitrator.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR CONDONING THE DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT)
This is a precedent for Miscellaneous Application for Condoning the delay in filing the Appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
DEED OF EXCHANGE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
This is a precedent of Deed of Exchange of immovable properties. The parties are owners of their respective immovable properties and wish to exchange the same.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION BY THE WIFE FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF NON-RESUMPTION OF CO-HABITATION FOR ONE YEAR AFTER DECREE OF JUDICIAL SEPARATION U/S. 27(2) (i) OF THE SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT 1954 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition for Non- resumption of Cohabitation for one year after Decree of Judicial Separation and for Alimony under Section 27 (2) (1) of Special Marriage Act,1954.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CERTIFICATE OF SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY BY BANKS UNDER SARFAESI ACT, 2002
This is a precedent of Sale of immovable property by Banks under SARFAESI Act 2002
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS COMMITTED ACTS CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 108 (o) OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 AS ALSO OF 16(1) (a) AND 16(1) (b) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court for recovery of possession on the ground that the Tenant has committed any act contrary to the provisions of clause (o) of section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in violation of 16(1) (a), 16(1) (b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 by damaging the suit premises and carrying out structural changes of a permanent nature.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
ARBITRATION PETITION UNDER SECTION 11 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR BEFORE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA/FOREIGN ARBITRATION
This is the precedent of a Petition under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to be filed before the Supreme Court of India in respect of an International Commercial Arbitration which empowers the court to examine the existence of an Arbitration Agreement while deciding the Application for Appointment of an Arbitrator.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
DEED OF EXCHANGE IN RESPECT OF RESIDENTIAL FLATS
The Parties are the Owners of their respective residential flats. Both the parties desires to exchange their respective flats with each other. This is the precedent of Deed of Exchange in respect of Residential Flats. This precedent can be also used for properties other than residential flats with appropriate changes.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.