Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
₹525 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
PETITION FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF NON-RESUMPTION OF CO-HABITATION FOR ONE YEAR AFTER DECREE OF JUDICIAL SEPARATION U/S. 13(1-A) (i) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition for Non- resumption of Cohabitation for one year after Decree of Judicial Separation and for Alimony under section 13 (1-A) (i) of Hindu Marriage Act,1955.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION BY THE WIFE FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF CRUELTY U/S. 13 1(ia) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT AND FOR ALIMONY (NO CHILDREN)
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition by Wife for Divorce and Alimony without children on the ground of Cruelty under Section 13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION FOR JUDICIAL SEPARATION ON THE GROUND OF DESERTION U/s. 10 R/W 13 (1) (ib) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent of a Petition by Wife for Judicial Separation and Alimony on the ground of desertion under Section 10 read with Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
BILLS OF EXCHANGE
This is the precedent of Bills of Exchange payable on demand and payable on due date.
₹70 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION FOR DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT UNDER SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT,1954
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition by mutual consent of Husband and Wife under Section 28 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
ARBITRATION PETITION UNDER SECTION 11 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR BEFORE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA/FOREIGN ARBITRATION
This is the precedent of a Petition under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to be filed before the Supreme Court of India in respect of an International Commercial Arbitration which empowers the court to examine the existence of an Arbitration Agreement while deciding the Application for Appointment of an Arbitrator.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.