Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
₹750 ₹525 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATEāS COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrateās Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrateās Court.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRSTĀ APPEALĀ WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF AĀ SECOND APPEALĀ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the firstĀ appealĀ which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of aĀ second appealĀ before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

PETITION BY THE WIFE FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF NON-RESUMPTION OF CO-HABITATION FOR ONE YEAR AFTER DECREE OF JUDICIAL SEPARATION U/S. 27(2) (i) OF THE SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT 1954 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition for Non- resumption of Cohabitation for one year after Decree of Judicial Separation and for Alimony under Section 27 (2) (1) of Special Marriage Act,1954.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

PETITION FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF NON-RESUMPTION OF CO-HABITATION FOR ONE YEAR AFTER DECREE OF JUDICIAL SEPARATION U/S. 13(1-A) (i) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition for Non- resumption of Cohabitation for one year after Decree of Judicial Separation and for Alimony under section 13 (1-A) (i) of Hindu Marriage Act,1955.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certainĀ ordersĀ passed in a suit before its final decision as providedĀ underĀ Section 104 read withĀ OrderĀ 43, Rule 1Ā of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Honāble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANYāS REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Companyās refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

CERTIFICATE OF SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY BY BANKS UNDER SARFAESI ACT, 2002
This is a precedent of Sale of immovable property by Banks under SARFAESI Act 2002
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT (OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE) FOR SEEKING EVICTION OF THE TENANT ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT AND PERMITTED INCREASES UNDER SECTION 15(2) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil Judge for seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent and permitted increases under Section 15(2) of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ONLY)
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

ARBITRATION PETITION UNDER SECTION 11 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR BEFORE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA/FOREIGN ARBITRATION
This is the precedent of a Petition under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to be filed before the Supreme Court of India in respect of an International Commercial Arbitration which empowers the court to examine the existence of anĀ ArbitrationĀ Agreement while deciding the Application for Appointment of an Arbitrator.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.