Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OF THE TRADEMARKED DESIGN
This is the precedent of suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from doing so and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark which consist of unique design. The Defendant is using the said design in infringement of Plaintiff’s registered trademark.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. In the instant case, the Deemed Conveyance Order is passed of the larger plot of land inspite of ongoing development, conflicting the right of other societies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AGAINST THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS FOR TREATING THE PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PATENT AS ABANDONED
This is the precedent of the Writ Of Certiorari and Mandamus against The Controller Of Patents And Designs for Treating the Petitioner’s Application for Grant of Patent as Abandoned. The Controller of Patents and Designs is treating the Petitioner’s Application for grant of Patent as abandoned.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION FOR QUASHING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (FIR) UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition For Quashing Of First Information Report (Fir) Under Section 482 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The first information report is registered against you by the investigating agency. The person feels the same is prime facie illegal and not maintainable.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ALLOTMENT OF THE TENDER
This is the precedent of Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari is often issued by a superior court to the inferior court, public official, public body corporation tribunal and also government. This is the precedent where the allotment of public tender to lowest one is challenged.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION OF MANDAMUS SEEKING DIRECTION FOR REGISTRATION OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (F.I.R.)
The Police is not acting on your Complaint and not registering First Information Report (FIR). This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition of Mandamus Seeking Direction For Registration of First Information Report (F.I.R.).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
Writ of quo warranto means a writ that you can be issued to restrain a person from holding any public office in the capacity of a Public Officer to which he/she does not have the entitlement. Here, the term Quo-Warranto means, "by what authority"; or, "on whose authority is one holding a public office". This is a precedent of Writ Petition of Quo Warranto.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari is often issued by a superior court to the inferior court, public official, public body corporation tribunal and also government. This petition challenges the Order and demand notice issued by the Stamp Authorities.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT COMPELLING THE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO TAKE MEASURES UNDER THE PRESCRIBED ACT AND RULES FRAMED THEREIN
This is the precedent of Public Interest Litigation/Writ Petition for compelling the Government Authority to take measures under the prescribed Act (i.e. The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986) and rules famed thereunder.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF DEVICE MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Device Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARK
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Journal, Notice of Opposition and Counter Statement to Notice of Opposition are filed. This is the precedent of Affidavit of Evidence in support of opposition to be filed by the party who is opposing the registration of the Trade Mark.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.