Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
The Magistrate's court and also Session's court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session's court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE FOR QUASHING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES)
This is the precedent of Writ petition for quashing of First Information Report (FIR) to the High Court by consent of the parties.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) FOR CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND TRANSFER OF INVESTIGATION FROM ONE POLICE STATION TO ANY OTHER POLICE STATION AND/OR AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) for Certiorari and Mandamus for further Investigation and Transfer of Investigation From One Police Station To any Other Police Station and/or Authority.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
REVISION PETITION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT AT DELHI AGAINST THE EVICTION ORDER OF RENT CONTROLLER UNDER DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958
The Rent Controller under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 has passed on eviction order against the Tenant. This is the precedent of revision petition before the High Court at Delhi against the eviction order of Rent Controller
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Prohibition to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ Petition of Prohibition is often issued by a superior court to the lower court directing it not to proceed with a case which does not fall under its jurisdiction.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARKS, COPYRIGHT AND PASSING OFF (COMPOSITE ACTION)
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for infringement of Trademarks, copyright and passing off (Composite Action) to restrain the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark, copyright and pass off the Plaintiff’s goods as of Defendant and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. In the instant case, the Deemed Conveyance Order is passed of the larger plot of land inspite of ongoing development, conflicting the right of other societies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OF THE TRADEMARKED DESIGN
This is the precedent of suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from doing so and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark which consist of unique design. The Defendant is using the said design in infringement of Plaintiff’s registered trademark.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF DEVICE MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Device Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TITLE OF THE FILM (TRADE MARK)
The plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The plaintiff’s application for registration of the trademark being the title of the film is pending. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on plaintiff’s title and pass off his film as the plaintiff’s film or remake of the plaintiff’s film or in any kind encashing the plaintiff’s goodwill. This is the suit for restraining the defended from doing so and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.