Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
₹1000 ₹700 (30% OFF)
The Magistrate’s court and also Session’s court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon’ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session’s court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT AFTER REJECTION OF THE APPLICATION BY THE SESSIONS COURT
This is the precedent of an Anticipatory Bail Application before the High Court after rejection of the Application of ABA by the session's court.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED UNDER SECTION 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
An order for ABA is already granted, however, the Accused/Applicant has breached the conditions imposed by the court. This is the precedent of an Application for cancellation of ABA.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
Writ of quo warranto means a writ that you can be issued to restrain a person from holding any public office in the capacity of a Public Officer to which he/she does not have the entitlement. Here, the term Quo-Warranto means, "by what authority"; or, "on whose authority is one holding a public office". This is a precedent of Writ Petition of Quo Warranto.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF CERTIORARI FOR QUASHING IMPUGNED NOTICES/ANALYSIS REPORTS UNDER FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT, 2006
This is the precedent of the Writ of Certiorari for Quashing Impugned Notices/Analysis Reports Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Food, safety and standard authority of India has issued recall notices to the Petitioner for recall of the petitioner’s products from the market.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 397 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT U/S. 102 OF THE SAID CODE REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE BANK ACCOUNTS
The Magistrate's court has refused to de-freeze Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Session's court. This is the precedent of Revision Application before the Session Court U/S. 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the order of the Magistrate's Court U/s. 102 of the said code refusing to de-freeze Bank Account
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF PROHIBITION TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Prohibition to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ Petition of Prohibition is often issued by a superior court to the lower court directing it not to proceed with a case which does not fall under its jurisdiction.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE HIGH COURT’S ORDER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION
This is the precedent of Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India challenging the High Court's order on anticipatory bail application. ABA is rejected by the Sessions court and High Court. The Supreme Court is the highest court to challenge the High Court's refusal and seek Anticipatory Bail.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. In the instant case, the Deemed Conveyance Order is passed of the larger plot of land inspite of ongoing development, conflicting the right of other societies.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT PETITION SEEKING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COLLEGE FOR GRANT OF RECOGNITION OF THE COURSE
This is a precedent of Writ of Mandamus filed before the Hon'ble High Court where a college is seeking grant of recognition of their course.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.