Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari is often issued by a superior court to the inferior court, public official, public body corporation tribunal and also government. This petition challenges the Order and demand notice issued by the Stamp Authorities.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COMPANY PETITION FOR OPPRESSION AND MIS MANAGEMENT
The Petitioners are minority shareholders. The Respondents are managing the Company to their benefit and detrimental to the interest of the Company and the Shareholders. The conduct of the Respondents is oppressive. This is the precedent of Company Petition for oppression and mismanagement to be preferred before NCLT.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL CONTEMPT)
This is a precedent of Contempt Petition (Criminal Contempt) under section 15 of The Contempt of Court Act, 1971.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) FOR CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND TRANSFER OF INVESTIGATION FROM ONE POLICE STATION TO ANY OTHER POLICE STATION AND/OR AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) for Certiorari and Mandamus for further Investigation and Transfer of Investigation From One Police Station To any Other Police Station and/or Authority.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. In the instant case, the Deemed Conveyance Order is passed of the larger plot of land inspite of ongoing development, conflicting the right of other societies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE FOR QUASHING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES)
This is the precedent of Writ petition for quashing of First Information Report (FIR) to the High Court by consent of the parties.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION TO CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE OR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/ SECURED CREDITOR U/S. 14 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF TAKING POSSESSION/FORCIBLE POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF THE SECURED ASSET
This is a precedent of an Application to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate by Banks/Financial Institutions/Secured Creditor u/s. 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for the purpose of taking possession/forcible possession or control of the Secured Asset. The Bank/Financial Institution/ Secured Creditor has become entitled to the possession of the Secured Asset under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, however, the Borrower is not co-operating.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION AGAINST THE ORDER OF SESSIONS COURT IN REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF ISSUANCE OF PROCESS
This is a precedent of the Criminal Writ Petition challenging the order passed by the Sessions Court for issuance of process under Section 138 and/or Section 138 read with 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT COMPELLING THE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO TAKE MEASURES UNDER THE PRESCRIBED ACT AND RULES FRAMED THEREIN
This is the precedent of Public Interest Litigation/Writ Petition for compelling the Government Authority to take measures under the prescribed Act (i.e. The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986) and rules famed thereunder.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE HIGH COURT’S ORDER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION
This is the precedent of Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India challenging the High Court's order on anticipatory bail application. ABA is rejected by the Sessions court and High Court. The Supreme Court is the highest court to challenge the High Court's refusal and seek Anticipatory Bail.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.