Act
The terms ‘Law‘ and ‘Act have certain similarities that they are used interchangeably at times. Yet, the key difference between them is that an Act is passed by the legislative and Law is the rules and regulation enforced by the government. Both are recurrent terms in the Polity segment of the IAS Exam.
Showing 1–12 of 28 results
- Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹525.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE TO TENANT FOR EVICTION FOR UNLAWFULLY SUB LETTING THE TENANTED PREMISES UNDER THE PROVISIONS THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of eviction notice to the tenant for unlawfully subletting the same to a third party without the consent of the Landlord under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999(FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA)
₹350.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE TO TENANT FOR EVICTION ON THE GROUND OF CAUSING NUISANCE AND ANNOYANCE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction notice to tenant for eviction on the ground of causing nuisance and annoyance under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999
₹350.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT (OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE) FOR SEEKING EVICTION OF THE TENANT ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT AND PERMITTED INCREASES UNDER SECTION 15(2) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil Judge for seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent and permitted increases under Section 15(2) of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ONLY)
₹700.00 Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS COMMITTED ACTS CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 108 (o) OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 AS ALSO OF 16(1) (a) AND 16(1) (b) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court for recovery of possession on the ground that the Tenant has committed any act contrary to the provisions of clause (o) of section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in violation of 16(1) (a), 16(1) (b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 by damaging the suit premises and carrying out structural changes of a permanent nature.
₹700.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700.00 Add to Cart - Sale!
PETITION FOR JUDICIAL SEPARATION ON THE GROUND OF DESERTION U/s. 10 R/W 13 (1) (ib) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent of a Petition by Wife for Judicial Separation and Alimony on the ground of desertion under Section 10 read with Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
₹525.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION BY THE WIFE FOR JUDICIAL SEPARATION ON THE GROUND OF DESERTION U/S 23 OF THE SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT 1954 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent by Wife for Judicial Separation and Alimony on the ground of desertion under Section 23 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
₹525.00 Preview HereAdd to Cart