Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
₹525.00 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
PETITION BY THE HUSBAND FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF CRUELTY U/S. 13 1(ia) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition by Husband on the ground of cruelty under Section 13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
PETITION BY THE WIFE FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF CRUELTY U/S. 13 1(ia) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT AND FOR ALIMONY (NO CHILDREN)
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition by Wife for Divorce and Alimony without children on the ground of Cruelty under Section 13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
PETITION BY THE WIFE FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF NON-RESUMPTION OF CO-HABITATION FOR ONE YEAR AFTER DECREE OF JUDICIAL SEPARATION U/S. 27(2) (i) OF THE SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT 1954 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition for Non- resumption of Cohabitation for one year after Decree of Judicial Separation and for Alimony under Section 27 (2) (1) of Special Marriage Act,1954.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
DEED OF EXCHANGE IN RESPECT OF RESIDENTIAL FLATS
The Parties are the Owners of their respective residential flats. Both the parties desires to exchange their respective flats with each other. This is the precedent of Deed of Exchange in respect of Residential Flats. This precedent can be also used for properties other than residential flats with appropriate changes.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
DEED OF EXCHANGE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
This is a precedent of Deed of Exchange of immovable properties. The parties are owners of their respective immovable properties and wish to exchange the same.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
BILLS OF EXCHANGE
This is the precedent of Bills of Exchange payable on demand and payable on due date.
₹70.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
ARBITRATION PETITION UNDER SECTION 11 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR BEFORE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA/FOREIGN ARBITRATION
This is the precedent of a Petition under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to be filed before the Supreme Court of India in respect of an International Commercial Arbitration which empowers the court to examine the existence of an Arbitration Agreement while deciding the Application for Appointment of an Arbitrator.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.