Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale! 
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
₹525 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
PETITION FOR DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF NON-RESUMPTION OF CO-HABITATION FOR ONE YEAR AFTER DECREE OF JUDICIAL SEPARATION U/S. 13(1-A) (i) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 AND FOR ALIMONY
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition for Non- resumption of Cohabitation for one year after Decree of Judicial Separation and for Alimony under section 13 (1-A) (i) of Hindu Marriage Act,1955.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
ARBITRATION APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 11 TO THE HON’BLE COURT FOR APPOINTMENT OF AN ARBITRATOR
This is the precedent of an Application under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 which empowers the Court to examine the existence of an Arbitration Agreement while deciding the Application for Appointment of an Arbitrator.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION FOR A DECREE OF DIVORCE U/S. 27 (1) (e) OF THE SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954 (ON THE GROUND OF MENTAL DISORDER)
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition for Decree of Divorce on the ground of Mental Disorder under Section 27 (1) (e) of Special Marriage Act, 1954.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRSTÂ APPEALÂ WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF AÂ SECOND APPEALÂ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INVOCATION NOTICE UNDER ARBTIRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR
Disputes have arose between the Parties and the Agreement between them provides for referring the same to Arbitration. This is the precedent of Invocation Notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator/s to arbitrate dispute between the Parties as per the written contract.
₹245 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION FOR DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT,1955
This is the precedent of Divorce Petition by mutual consent of Husband and Wife under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT (OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE) FOR SEEKING EVICTION OF THE TENANT ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT AND PERMITTED INCREASES UNDER SECTION 15(2) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil Judge for seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent and permitted increases under Section 15(2) of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ONLY)
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.