Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Defendant is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. This is the precedent of a suit for public nuisance restraining the Defendant/s from causing and continuing to cause such nuisance.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRSTÂ APPEALÂ WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF AÂ SECOND APPEALÂ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED IN APPEAL COURT SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT/APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER RERAÂ CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF AÂ SECOND APPEALÂ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
The Decree/Judgment passed by any Appellate Civil Court in the appeal which Court is sub ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a Second Appeal before the High Court. This is a precedent of Second Appeal to High Court under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This precedent will be also helpful for an Appeal to High Court under Section 58 of The Real Estate (Regulation and Development Act, 2016 (RERA).
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE HIGH COURT’S ORDER ON CRIMINAL (BAIL) APPLICATION
The High Court has rejected the Bail Application of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. This the precedent of Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India challenging the High Court's Order on Criminal (Bail) Application.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR MONEY LENT AND ADVANCED
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of money lent and advanced.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
Writ of quo warranto means a writ that you can be issued to restrain a person from holding any public office in the capacity of a Public Officer to which he/she does not have the entitlement. Here, the term Quo-Warranto means, "by what authority"; or, "on whose authority is one holding a public office". This is a precedent of Writ Petition of Quo Warranto.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certain orders passed in a suit before its final decision as provided under Section 104 read with Order 43, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 80 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The Plaintiff desires to file a Civil Suit against the Government or against a Public Officer purporting to act in his official capacity. However, in such a case the Plaintiff is required to serve in advance a Statutory Notice under Section 80 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to the concerned Government/Government Departments/ Public Officer. This is a precedent of Notice under Section 80 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
₹210 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION OF MANDAMUS SEEKING DIRECTION FOR REGISTRATION OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (F.I.R.)
The Police is not acting on your Complaint and not registering First Information Report (FIR). This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition of Mandamus Seeking Direction For Registration of First Information Report (F.I.R.).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. This is the Writ Petition challenging the Order of deemed conveyance by quasi Judicial authority in respect of Freehold property.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
ADOPTION PETITION (UNDER GUARDSHIP AND WARDS ACT 1890) WITH THE CONSENT OF THE NATURAL GUARDIANS OF THE CHILD
This is the precedent of Adoption Petition (under Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890) to be filed before the court for adopting a child with the consent of the natural guardians/biological parents of the child.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Habeas Corpus, a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court order the custodian of the person, usually a prison official, to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether the detention is lawful.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.