You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.

Sale!

AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Name: AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
SKU: 2045
Price: 525 INR
Availability: InStock

₹525 (30% OFF)

The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party’s case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII Rule 4 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Category: Arbitration Tags: 1872, Affidavit before Arbitrator, Affidavit in lieu of Examination in Chief, Affidavit of Evidence, Arbitration, Certificate under Section 65(B)(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, CPC, Evidence Act, Evidence Affidavit, examination in chief, Indian Evidence Act, Order 18, Order 19, Order XIX, Order XVIII, The Civil Procedure Code

Reviews (0)

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

GET HELP

AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Reviews

FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT

SUMMARY SUIT FOR MONEY LENT AND ADVANCED

APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

SUIT FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL REJECTING THE APPLICATION FOR RELIEFS

SUIT FOR EXECUTION OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT/DECREE PASSED BY A NON-RECIPROCATING COUNTRY

SUMMARY SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT FOR GOODS SOLD AND DELIVERED

CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 65(B) OF THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR

APPLICATION BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 16 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 (CHALLENGING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL)

ARBITRATION AGREEMENT (BETWEEN PARTIES TO REFER THEIR EXISTING DISPUTES TO ARBITRATION)

THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)

SUMMARY SUIT BASED ON DISHONOURED CHEQUES

AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Reviews

Recommended based on your search

FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT

SUMMARY SUIT FOR MONEY LENT AND ADVANCED

APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

SUIT FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL REJECTING THE APPLICATION FOR RELIEFS

SUIT FOR EXECUTION OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT/DECREE PASSED BY A NON-RECIPROCATING COUNTRY

SUMMARY SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT FOR GOODS SOLD AND DELIVERED

CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 65(B) OF THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR

APPLICATION BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 16 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 (CHALLENGING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL)

ARBITRATION AGREEMENT (BETWEEN PARTIES TO REFER THEIR EXISTING DISPUTES TO ARBITRATION)

THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)

SUMMARY SUIT BASED ON DISHONOURED CHEQUES