Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
SUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PLAINTIFF FROM THE PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
₹1000 ₹700 (30% OFF)
A person apprehends he will be dispossessed from the property without following the due process of law. This is a
precedent of Suit for an Injunction from Dispossessing the Plaintiff from the property without due process of law.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The immovable property of a third party is attached in execution of a decree of the Court. This is a precedent of an application for raising Warrant of Attachment of immovable property under Order 21 Rule 54 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
A person was maliciously prosecuted and prosecution against him/her failed. This is a precedent of Suit for damages for Malicious Prosecution.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM AND FOR IT’S ACCOUNTS
A Partnership Firm is dissolved by notice or otherwise. This is a precedent of Suit for Dissolution of a Partnership Firm, for accounts and for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF THE REMAINING PRICE OF GOODS ORDERED WHEN DELIVERY NOT ACCEPTED
The Purchaser of the goods, though made part advance payment, has refused to accept the delivery of goods. This is a precedent of a Suit for recovery of the remaining price of goods ordered but delivery not accepted and for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII (4) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with averments to prove document u/s. 65 (B) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 along with requisite Certificate also with averment to prove documents by Secondary evidence.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE
The Defendants have availed financial facility from the Plaintiff against the Mortgage of their property. The Defendants have failed to pay the mortgage debt to the Plaintiff. The Defendants have failed to redeem the Mortgage. The Plaintiff claims to be entitled to foreclosure the mortgage and become the Owner of the mortgaged property. This is the precedent of a suit for foreclosure of mortgage.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR PARTITION OF AN IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
The immovable property is owned by several Co-Owners. Some of the Co-owners desire to Partition the property. This is a precedent of Suit for Partition of an immovable property.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR REDEMPTION OF MORTGAGE
The property is mortgaged. The Mortgagor desires to redeem the mortgaged property through Court. This is a precedent of suit for Redemption of Mortgage.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR DECLARATION THAT PURPORTED AGREEMENT IS VOID AND, IN ANY EVENT, THE SAME IS VALIDLY TERMINATED
The Parties have entered into an Agreement. One of the parties is contending that the Agreement is void and, in any event, the same is terminated. This is a precedent of suit for declaration that purported Agreement is void and, in any event, the same is validly terminated.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

CIVIL SUIT TO RECOVER MONEY (NOT A SUMMARY SUIT)
This is a precedent of Regular Civil Suit to recover money from the Defendant (Not a Summary Suit).
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.