Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale! 
SUIT FOR DECLARING A PERSON WHO IS NOT TRACEABLE AS DEAD AND FOR SEEKING DIRECTION AGAINST THE CONCERNED AUTHORITY TO ISSUE HIS/HER DEATH CERTIFICATE
₹700 (30% OFF)
A person is missing for over a period of seven years and his whereabouts are not known in spite of efforts by the family and the Police Authorities. This is the precedent of a suit for declaration that missing person is presumed to have died and asking the authorities to issue Death Certificate of such a missing person.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
ARBITRATION PETITION UNDER SECTION 34 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (FOR SETTING ASIDE THE AWARD)
This is the precedent of the Petition to be filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Court for challenging the Arbitral Award passed by the Arbitrator. It is an Appeal filed by the aggrieved party challenging the Award passed by the Arbitrator before the Court.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Defendant is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. This is the precedent of a suit for public nuisance restraining the Defendant/s from causing and continuing to cause such nuisance.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR EXECUTION OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT/DECREE PASSED BY A NON-RECIPROCATING COUNTRY
A foreign Judgment/Decree is passed by a Non-Reciprocating Country against Indian Party who desires to execute the foreign Judgment in India. This is a precedent of suit for execution of a foreign Judgment/Decree passed by Non Reciprocating Country.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COMPLAINT BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT UNDER SECTIONS 465, 468, 419, 471, 474, 120-B R/W 34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE,1860 (IPC) FOR INVESTIGATION UNDER SECTION 156 (3) of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973
This is the precedent of Complaint Before The Magistrate’s Court Under Sections 465, 468, 419, 471, 474, 120-B R/W 34 Of Indian Penal Code,1860 (IPC) For Investigation Under Section 156 (3) Of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The person has complaint to police authority for investigating the offences. However, the police is not taking steps. The person can approach the quote seeking direction for investigating the offences.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The parties have entered into an Agreement. The disputes have arisen. This is a precedent of Suit for Specific Performance.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT BASED ON DISHONOURED CHEQUES
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 for recovery of the amount based on the dishonoured cheques.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR MONEY LENT AND ADVANCED
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of money lent and advanced.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BASED ON PERSONALITY RIGHTS
The Plaintiff is a Celebrity having personality rights. The Defendant is wrongfully attempting to use Plaintiff’s name and other personality rights without the consent of the Plaintiff for commercial gain. This is a precedent of suit based on personality rights for an injunction and consequential reliefs.
₹875 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT CHALLENGING THE TERMINATION AND SEEKING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The Parties had entered into an Agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit by aggrieved party challenging the termination and seeking specific performance of the Agreement and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII Rule 4 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE AGREEMENT STANDS VALIDLY TERMINATED
The Parties had entered into an agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit for a declaration that Agreement is validly terminated and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.