Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT FOR GOODS SOLD AND DELIVERED
₹350 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of amount for goods sold and delivered.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR DECLARATION THAT PURPORTED AGREEMENT IS VOID AND, IN ANY EVENT, THE SAME IS VALIDLY TERMINATED
The Parties have entered into an Agreement. One of the parties is contending that the Agreement is void and, in any event, the same is terminated. This is a precedent of suit for declaration that purported Agreement is void and, in any event, the same is validly terminated.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR REDEMPTION OF MORTGAGE
The property is mortgaged. The Mortgagor desires to redeem the mortgaged property through Court. This is a precedent of suit for Redemption of Mortgage.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR SALE OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY (SIMPLE MORTGAGE)
The property is mortgaged. Mortgaged debt is not paid. Mortgaged Property is required to be sold through Court. This is a precedent of suit for Sale of Mortgaged Property and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PLAINTIFF FROM THE PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
A person apprehends he will be dispossessed from the property without following the due process of law. This is a precedent of Suit for an Injunction from Dispossessing the Plaintiff from the property without due process of law.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION U/S 6 OF SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963
A person is forcibly dispossessed from the property without process of law. This is a precedent of suit for Recovery of Possession under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Defendant is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. This is the precedent of a suit for public nuisance restraining the Defendant/s from causing and continuing to cause such nuisance.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII Rule 4 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL SUIT TO RECOVER MONEY (NOT A SUMMARY SUIT)
This is a precedent of Regular Civil Suit to recover money from the Defendant (Not a Summary Suit).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE
The Defendants have availed financial facility from the Plaintiff against the Mortgage of their property. The Defendants have failed to pay the mortgage debt to the Plaintiff. The Defendants have failed to redeem the Mortgage. The Plaintiff claims to be entitled to foreclosure the mortgage and become the Owner of the mortgaged property. This is the precedent of a suit for foreclosure of mortgage.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF THE DECEASED
The disputes and differences have arisen amongst the legal heirs of the deceased in respect of the estate of the deceased. This is a precedent of Suit for Administration of the Estate of the Deceased.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.