Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
₹1000 ₹700 (30% OFF)
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF BAIL UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 437(A) (WHERE ACCUSED IS ACQUITTED) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973
This is the precedent of an Application for Grant of Bail under the provisions of Sec 437 (A) (where Accused is acquitted) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 397 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT U/S. 102 OF THE SAID CODE REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE BANK ACCOUNTS
The Magistrate's court has refused to de-freeze Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Session's court. This is the precedent of Revision Application before the Session Court U/S. 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the order of the Magistrate's Court U/s. 102 of the said code refusing to de-freeze Bank Account
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION SEEKING PERMISSION/LEAVE TO TRAVEL ABROAD WHILE ON BAIL
While allowing the Bail Application, it is practiced to impose condition upon the Applicant not to travel outside India without permission of the Court. This is a precedent of an Application to obtain permission from the Court to travel abroad.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

BAIL APPLICATION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 439 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AFTER REJECTION OF THE APPLICATION BY THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT AND SESSIONS COURT
This precedent is of Bail Application before the High Court U/s. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 after rejection of the Application by the Magistrate's court and Session's court.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
This is the precedent of an application for Anticipatory Bail before the sessions court U/s. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to seek protection from an arrest on the basis of FIR registered.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

CRIMINAL APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT AGAINST THE ORDER OF CONVICTION BY SESSIONS COURT
This is the precedent of Criminal Appeal Before The High Court Against The Order Of Conviction By Sessions Court.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF A PRIVATE COMPLAINT FOR COMPOUNDABLE OFFENCES
The parties have settle the dispute in a private complaint involving compoundable offences. This is the precedent of an application for withdrawal of a private complaint for compoundable offences.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.