Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
₹1000 ₹700 (30% OFF)
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF A COMMISSION (TO RECORD THE EVIDENCE) UNDER SECTIONS 284 AND 285 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973
This is the precedent of An Application For Issuance Of A Commission (To Record The Evidence) Under Sections 284 And 285 Of The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The person is unable to attend the court for recording his/her evidence for certain reasons.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR DE-FREEZING/UNFREEZING OF BANK ACCOUNT FREEZE BY INVESTIGATING AGENCY.
The Bank Accounts/properties of the Accused are freeze by the Investigating Agency. This is a precedent of an Application for de-freezing/unfreezing of Bank Account freeze by Investigating Agency.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF A PRIVATE COMPLAINT FOR COMPOUNDABLE OFFENCES
The parties have settle the dispute in a private complaint involving compoundable offences. This is the precedent of an application for withdrawal of a private complaint for compoundable offences.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

PRIVATE COMPLAINT TO MAGISTRATE’S COURT UNDER SECTIONS145 AND 146 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST FORCIBLY DISPOSSESSING FROM THE PROPERTY
A person is forcibly dispossessed from the property. The police is not assisting. This is the precedent of a Private Complaint to be made to Magistrate’s Court under Section 145 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

BAIL APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT UNDER SECTION 439 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 IN THE CASE WHERE BAIL APPLICATION IS REJECTED BY THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT
This is the precedent of Bail Application before the Session's court U/s. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 wherein Bail Application is rejected by the Magistrate's court.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
The Magistrate's court and also Session's court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session's court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 397 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT U/S. 102 OF THE SAID CODE REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE BANK ACCOUNTS
The Magistrate's court has refused to de-freeze Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Session's court. This is the precedent of Revision Application before the Session Court U/S. 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the order of the Magistrate's Court U/s. 102 of the said code refusing to de-freeze Bank Account
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION OF THE ACCUSED FROM PERSONALLY APPEARING BEFORE THE HONOURABLE COURT
The case is pending before Magistrate’s Court or Session’s Court and the Accused is personally unable to attend before the concerned Court on some genuine and bonafide reason. This is the precedent of an application seeking exemption from personal appearance before the court on that particular day.
₹350₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION SEEKING PERMISSION/LEAVE TO TRAVEL ABROAD WHILE ON BAIL
While allowing the Bail Application, it is practiced to impose condition upon the Applicant not to travel outside India without permission of the Court. This is a precedent of an Application to obtain permission from the Court to travel abroad.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

COMPLAINT BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT UNDER SECTIONS 465, 468, 419, 471, 474, 120-B R/W 34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE,1860 (IPC) FOR INVESTIGATION UNDER SECTION 156 (3) of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973
This is the precedent of Complaint Before The Magistrate’s Court Under Sections 465, 468, 419, 471, 474, 120-B R/W 34 Of Indian Penal Code,1860 (IPC) For Investigation Under Section 156 (3) Of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The person has complaint to police authority for investigating the offences. However, the police is not taking steps. The person can approach the quote seeking direction for investigating the offences.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.