₹700.00 (30% OFF)

Sale!

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT

Name: CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
Price: 700.00 INR
Availability: InStock

₹700.00 (30% OFF)

This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.

Preview Here

Categories: Maharashtra Rent Control Act, Renting of Property Tags: Appeal, Appeal against Small Causes Court, Appellate, application, Challenging, Civil, Judgment, Order, Revision, Small Causes Court

Reviews (0)

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

GET HELP

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT

Reviews

SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT (OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE) FOR SEEKING EVICTION OF THE TENANT ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT AND PERMITTED INCREASES UNDER SECTION 15(2) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999

LEASE OF LAND TOGETHER WITH THE BUILDING

PETITION UNDER SECTION 14(1) READ WITH SECTION 25B OF THE DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 (AS AMENDED UPTO DATE) FOR EVICTION OF THE RESPONDENT/ TENANT FROM THE TENANTED PREMISES ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT IN SPITE OF REQUIRED NOTICE

SURRENDER OF TENANCY RIGHTS

NOTICE TO TENANT FOR EVICTION ON THE GROUND OF CAUSING NUISANCE AND ANNOYANCE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999

AGREEMENT FOR LEASE OF THE ENTIRE BUILDING

REVISION PETITION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT AT DELHI AGAINST THE EVICTION ORDER OF RENT CONTROLLER UNDER DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958

SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS NOT USED THE PREMISES FOR A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX MONTHS UNDER SECTION 16(1)(n) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999

EVICTION NOTICE TO TENANT FOR DAMAGING THE TENANTED PROPERTY AND CARRYING OUT PERMANENT STRUCTURAL CHANGES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE LANDLORD

AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT

Reviews

Recommended based on your search

SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT (OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE) FOR SEEKING EVICTION OF THE TENANT ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT AND PERMITTED INCREASES UNDER SECTION 15(2) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999

LEASE OF LAND TOGETHER WITH THE BUILDING

PETITION UNDER SECTION 14(1) READ WITH SECTION 25B OF THE DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 (AS AMENDED UPTO DATE) FOR EVICTION OF THE RESPONDENT/ TENANT FROM THE TENANTED PREMISES ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT IN SPITE OF REQUIRED NOTICE

SURRENDER OF TENANCY RIGHTS

NOTICE TO TENANT FOR EVICTION ON THE GROUND OF CAUSING NUISANCE AND ANNOYANCE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999

AGREEMENT FOR LEASE OF THE ENTIRE BUILDING

REVISION PETITION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT AT DELHI AGAINST THE EVICTION ORDER OF RENT CONTROLLER UNDER DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958

SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS NOT USED THE PREMISES FOR A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX MONTHS UNDER SECTION 16(1)(n) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999

EVICTION NOTICE TO TENANT FOR DAMAGING THE TENANTED PROPERTY AND CARRYING OUT PERMANENT STRUCTURAL CHANGES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE LANDLORD

LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR ADVERTISEMENT HOARDING

AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.