Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
SUIT BY PLAINTIFFS/TENANTS UNDER THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT,1999 FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE THE TENANTS OF THE SUIT PREMISES
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of the suit by the Tenants for order and decree declaring the Plaintiffs as the monthly tenants of the suit premises under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS NOT USED THE PREMISES FOR A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX MONTHS UNDER SECTION 16(1)(n) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court or before the court of civil judge for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises on the ground that the Tenant has not used the said premises for a continuous period of more than six months as contemplated under section 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS COMMITTED ACTS CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 108 (o) OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 AS ALSO OF 16(1) (a) AND 16(1) (b) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court for recovery of possession on the ground that the Tenant has committed any act contrary to the provisions of clause (o) of section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in violation of 16(1) (a), 16(1) (b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 by damaging the suit premises and carrying out structural changes of a permanent nature.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION NOTICE TO TENANT FOR DAMAGING THE TENANTED PROPERTY AND CARRYING OUT PERMANENT STRUCTURAL CHANGES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE LANDLORD
This is a precedent of eviction notice to the tenant for damaging the tenanted property and carrying out permanent structural changes without the consent of the Landlord under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION FOR EVICTION OF TENANT UNDER SECTION 14(1)(e) OF DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 (AS AMENDED UPTO DATE) ON THE GROUND OF BONAFIDE REQUIREMENT OF THE LANDLORD
The Tenancy is governed under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The premises is occupied by tenant. The landlord needs the premises for his own bona fide requirement. This is the precedent of eviction of Tenant on the ground of Bona fide requirement of the Landlord.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
LEASE OF LAND TOGETHER WITH THE BUILDING
The Lessor is the Owner of the Plot of land together with the building thereon, giving the same on long lease to the Lessee. This is the precedent of an Indenture of Lease whereby the Lessor is giving his plot of land along with the building on long lease to the Lessee.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PETITION UNDER SECTION 14(1) READ WITH SECTION 25B OF THE DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 (AS AMENDED UPTO DATE) FOR EVICTION OF THE RESPONDENT/ TENANT FROM THE TENANTED PREMISES ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT IN SPITE OF REQUIRED NOTICE
The Tenancy is governed under The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The Tenant has not paid the rent inspite of requisite notice. This is the precedent for eviction of Tenant from the Tenanted Premises on the ground of Non-payment of rent inspite of Notice.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (i) THE TENANT HAS UNLAWFULLY SUB-LET OR GIVEN ON LICENSE THE PREMISES UNDER SECTION 16(1)(e) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND (ii) THE PREMISES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE IMMEDIATE PURPOSE OF DEMOLITION ORDERED BY ANY MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OR OTHER COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 16(1)(k) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999.
This is a precedent of an eviction suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court or before the court of civil judge for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises on the grounds that the Tenant has unlawfully sublet or given on license the premises as contemplated under section 16(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and further that the said premises are required by the landlord for immediate demolition as ordered by the concerned authority under section 16(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 .
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SERVICE TENANCY AGREEMENT
The Employers are the Owners of the premises/flat. The Employer is creating temporary tenancy in respect of the same in favour of its employee for and during the period of his employment. This is the precedent of an agreement of service tenancy (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA).
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY BY THE LANDLORDS TO RECOVER THE POSSESSION AND DAMAGES IN RESPECT OF A RESIDENTIAL PREMISES GIVEN ON LEAVE AND LICENSE BASIS ON EXPIRY OF THE PERIOD OF THE LICENSE
This is a precedent of an application to the Competent Authority by the Landlords to recover the possession and damages in respect of a residential premises given on leave and license basis on expiry of the period of the license and for consequential reliefs under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA).
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.