Precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal

Name: STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
Price: 525.00 INR
Availability: InStock

Sale!

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES

The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.

PRIVACY POLICY FOR WEBSITES

This is a precedent of Privacy Policy of the owners and operators of website for users/visitors of Website.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE CONTEST

This is the precedent of terms and conditions for participating in the contest conducted on Website.

1.50 out of 5

AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT

This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992

This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AGREEMENT

The Transferor is in possession of technical know-how/ technical information and desires to transfer the same to a third party on outright or license basis. This is the precedent of Technology Transfer Agreement.

THE REVISION APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR REVISION OF THE ORDER MADE UNDER SECTION 143 (1) OF THE ACT

This is the precedent of the Revisional Application to the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act for Revision of the Order made under section 143(1) of the Act. The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. The Assessee has not preferred any appeal against the same. The Assessee desires to revise the order by approaching The Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act.

THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)

"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."

APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT

The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.

APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 260 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

The Income Tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) has made an Order against the Assessee. The Assessee wants to further challenge the said Order before the Hon’ble High Court. This is the precedent of an Appeal to the High Court against the Order of ITAT under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

3.00 out of 5

MASTER SUBCRIPTION AGREEMENT

The Supplier is a provider of Subscription Services related to Information and Technology (IT) field. This is a precedent of Master Subscription Agreement between the Supplier and the Customer/User for providing such Services.

3.00 out of 5

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

The services of Software Developer is engaged by the Company/Buyer for development of the Software. This is a precedent of Software Development Agreement.

₹700.00 Preview Here

Buy Now

Add to Cart

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT

Customers' review

Reviews

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES

PRIVACY POLICY FOR WEBSITES

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE CONTEST

AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AGREEMENT

THE REVISION APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR REVISION OF THE ORDER MADE UNDER SECTION 143 (1) OF THE ACT

THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)

APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT

APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 260 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

MASTER SUBCRIPTION AGREEMENT

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT

Customers' review

Reviews

Recommended based on your search

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES

PRIVACY POLICY FOR WEBSITES

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE CONTEST

AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AGREEMENT

THE REVISION APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR REVISION OF THE ORDER MADE UNDER SECTION 143 (1) OF THE ACT

THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)

APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT

APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 260 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

MASTER SUBCRIPTION AGREEMENT

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT