Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
₹750.00 ₹525.00 (30% OFF)
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
₹500.00₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
MASTER SUBCRIPTION AGREEMENT
The Supplier is a provider of Subscription Services related to Information and Technology (IT) field. This is a precedent of Master Subscription Agreement between the Supplier and the Customer/User for providing such Services.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
MASTER RESELLER AGREEMENT
The Company is a licensor, manufacturer and seller of products such as Software, hardware and related products, materials, Support and Services. Master Reseller is a reseller of such products. This is a precedent of Master Reseller Agreement between the Company and the Master Reseller.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE CONTEST
This is the precedent of terms and conditions for participating in the contest conducted on Website.
₹500.00₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certain orders passed in a suit before its final decision as provided under Section 104 read with Order 43, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
PRIVACY POLICY FOR WEBSITES
This is a precedent of Privacy Policy of the owners and operators of website for users/visitors of Website.
₹500.00₹350.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
THE REVISION APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR REVISION OF THE ORDER MADE UNDER SECTION 143 (1) OF THE ACT
This is the precedent of the Revisional Application to the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act for Revision of the Order made under section 143(1) of the Act. The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. The Assessee has not preferred any appeal against the same. The Assessee desires to revise the order by approaching The Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act.
₹750.00₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.