Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
₹700.00 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION BY A THIRD PARTY TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL FOR VACATING AN INJUNCTION ORDER PASSED AGAINST HIS PROPERTY FOR THE DEBT OF THE BORROWER
This is a precedent of an Application by a third party to Debt Recovery Tribunal for vacating an injunction order passed against his property for recovery of Debt of Borrowers/Guarantors.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993 TO RECOVER DEBT
This is a precedent of an Application by Banks/Financial Institutions under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to recover debt before Debt Recovery Tribunal. In this case systematic fraud is play upon the Applicant.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 20 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBT DUE TO BANK AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate F153Tribunal challenging the Order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993 TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
This is a precedent of an Application by Banks/Financial Institutions under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to recover debt before Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of an Affidavit of Evidence in support of the Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹420.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.