Customers' review
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may write a review.
Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
₹700.00 (30% OFF)
The Magistrate’s court and also Session’s court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon’ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session’s court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
Writ of quo warranto means a writ that you can be issued to restrain a person from holding any public office in the capacity of a Public Officer to which he/she does not have the entitlement. Here, the term Quo-Warranto means, "by what authority"; or, "on whose authority is one holding a public office". This is a precedent of Writ Petition of Quo Warranto.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 397 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT U/S. 102 OF THE SAID CODE REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE BANK ACCOUNTS
The Magistrate's court has refused to de-freeze Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Session's court. This is the precedent of Revision Application before the Session Court U/S. 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the order of the Magistrate's Court U/s. 102 of the said code refusing to de-freeze Bank Account
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AGAINST THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS FOR TREATING THE PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PATENT AS ABANDONED
This is the precedent of the Writ Of Certiorari and Mandamus against The Controller Of Patents And Designs for Treating the Petitioner’s Application for Grant of Patent as Abandoned. The Controller of Patents and Designs is treating the Petitioner’s Application for grant of Patent as abandoned.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI FOR QUASHING IMPUGNED NOTICES/ANALYSIS REPORTS UNDER FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT, 2006
This is the precedent of the Writ of Certiorari for Quashing Impugned Notices/Analysis Reports Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Food, safety and standard authority of India has issued recall notices to the Petitioner for recall of the petitioner’s products from the market.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION FOR DISPENSING WITH THE CONDITION IMPOSED WHILE GRANTING ANTICIPATORY BAIL
The Conditions are imposed while granting Anticipatory Bail (ABA). The Applicant wants to apply to the Court for dispensing with the conditions. This is the precedent for the same.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Habeas Corpus, a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court order the custodian of the person, usually a prison official, to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether the detention is lawful.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
BAIL APPLICATION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 439 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AFTER REJECTION OF THE APPLICATION BY THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT AND SESSIONS COURT
This precedent is of Bail Application before the High Court U/s. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 after rejection of the Application by the Magistrate's court and Session's court.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
This is the precedent of an application for Anticipatory Bail before the sessions court U/s. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to seek protection from an arrest on the basis of FIR registered.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.