Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Magistrate’s court and also Session’s court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon’ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session’s court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
AN APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED UNDER SECTION 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
An order for ABA is already granted, however, the Accused/Applicant has breached the conditions imposed by the court. This is the precedent of an Application for cancellation of ABA.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 397 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT U/S. 102 OF THE SAID CODE REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE BANK ACCOUNTS
The Magistrate's court has refused to de-freeze Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Session's court. This is the precedent of Revision Application before the Session Court U/S. 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the order of the Magistrate's Court U/s. 102 of the said code refusing to de-freeze Bank Account
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
BAIL APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT UNDER SECTION 439 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 IN THE CASE WHERE BAIL APPLICATION IS REJECTED BY THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT
This is the precedent of Bail Application before the Session's court U/s. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 wherein Bail Application is rejected by the Magistrate's court.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Habeas Corpus, a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court order the custodian of the person, usually a prison official, to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether the detention is lawful.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF REGULAR BAIL UNDER SECTION 437 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
This is the precedent of an Application for grant of regular Bail U/s. 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to the Magistrate's court when an Accused is already arrested.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. This is the Writ Petition challenging the Order of deemed conveyance by quasi Judicial authority in respect of Freehold property.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT COMPELLING THE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO TAKE MEASURES UNDER THE PRESCRIBED ACT AND RULES FRAMED THEREIN
This is the precedent of Public Interest Litigation/Writ Petition for compelling the Government Authority to take measures under the prescribed Act (i.e. The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986) and rules famed thereunder.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION OF MANDAMUS FOR TRANSFER OF INVESTIGATION FROM ONE OFFICER TO ANOTHER INVESTIGATING OFFICER
This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition of Mandamus For Transfer of Investigation From One Officer To Another Investigating Officer. The First Information Report (FIR) is registered. The party feels Investigating Officer is favouring someone.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT FOR EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER WHILE REJECTING AN APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
This is the precedent of an Application before the Session's court for extension of Interim order while rejecting an Application for Anticipatory Bail. An application for an anticipatory bail is rejected. Earlier interim protection was granted. By this Application, the Applicant is seeking continuation of interim protection till he goes to higher court.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI FOR QUASHING IMPUGNED NOTICES/ANALYSIS REPORTS UNDER FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT, 2006
This is the precedent of the Writ of Certiorari for Quashing Impugned Notices/Analysis Reports Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Food, safety and standard authority of India has issued recall notices to the Petitioner for recall of the petitioner’s products from the market.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ALLOTMENT OF THE TENDER
This is the precedent of Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari is often issued by a superior court to the inferior court, public official, public body corporation tribunal and also government. This is the precedent where the allotment of public tender to lowest one is challenged.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.