Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale! 
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION OF MANDAMUS SEEKING DIRECTION FOR REGISTRATION OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (F.I.R.)
The Police is not acting on your Complaint and not registering First Information Report (FIR). This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition of Mandamus Seeking Direction For Registration of First Information Report (F.I.R.).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AGAINST THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS FOR TREATING THE PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PATENT AS ABANDONED
This is the precedent of the Writ Of Certiorari and Mandamus against The Controller Of Patents And Designs for Treating the Petitioner’s Application for Grant of Patent as Abandoned. The Controller of Patents and Designs is treating the Petitioner’s Application for grant of Patent as abandoned.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COMPANY PETITION FOR OPPRESSION AND MIS MANAGEMENT
The Petitioners are minority shareholders. The Respondents are managing the Company to their benefit and detrimental to the interest of the Company and the Shareholders. The conduct of the Respondents is oppressive. This is the precedent of Company Petition for oppression and mismanagement to be preferred before NCLT.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Habeas Corpus, a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court order the custodian of the person, usually a prison official, to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether the detention is lawful.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
This is the precedent of writ petition under the Article 32 of the Constitution of India to be filed directly before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Such Petitions are mainly in the form of Public Interest Litigation.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. In the instant case, the Deemed Conveyance Order is passed of the larger plot of land inspite of ongoing development, conflicting the right of other societies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE HIGH COURT’S ORDER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION
This is the precedent of Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India challenging the High Court's order on anticipatory bail application. ABA is rejected by the Sessions court and High Court. The Supreme Court is the highest court to challenge the High Court's refusal and seek Anticipatory Bail.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF PASSPORT
The passport of the Accused in criminal case has expired. He needs to renew the same. This is an application to the court where criminal case is pending seeking leave of the court to renew the passport.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL CONTEMPT)
This is a precedent of Contempt Petition (Civil Contempt) to be filed before the High Court. The Respondents have committed breaches of the undertakings given to the Hon’ble Court.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.