Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
₹700.00 (30% OFF)
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION SEEKING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COLLEGE FOR GRANT OF RECOGNITION OF THE COURSE
This is a precedent of Writ of Mandamus filed before the Hon'ble High Court where a college is seeking grant of recognition of their course.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
This is the precedent of writ petition under the Article 32 of the Constitution of India to be filed directly before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Such Petitions are mainly in the form of Public Interest Litigation.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF PASSPORT
The passport of the Accused in criminal case has expired. He needs to renew the same. This is an application to the court where criminal case is pending seeking leave of the court to renew the passport.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Prohibition to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ Petition of Prohibition is often issued by a superior court to the lower court directing it not to proceed with a case which does not fall under its jurisdiction.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE HIGH COURT’S ORDER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION
This is the precedent of Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India challenging the High Court's order on anticipatory bail application. ABA is rejected by the Sessions court and High Court. The Supreme Court is the highest court to challenge the High Court's refusal and seek Anticipatory Bail.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. In the instant case, the Deemed Conveyance Order is passed of the larger plot of land inspite of ongoing development, conflicting the right of other societies.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION BY WAY OF COMPANY PETITION/APPEAL FOR RESTORATION OF THE NAME OF THE COMPANY WHICH WAS STRUCK OFF BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
The Company defaulted in filing statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies. Therefore, the Registrar of Companies have struck off the name of the Company from the list of Register of Companies. Now remedy is to approach NCLT. This is the precedent of an Application by way of Company Petition/Appeal for restoration of the name of the Company which was struck off by the Registrar of Companies.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL CONTEMPT)
This is a precedent of Contempt Petition (Criminal Contempt) under section 15 of The Contempt of Court Act, 1971.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
Writ of quo warranto means a writ that you can be issued to restrain a person from holding any public office in the capacity of a Public Officer to which he/she does not have the entitlement. Here, the term Quo-Warranto means, "by what authority"; or, "on whose authority is one holding a public office". This is a precedent of Writ Petition of Quo Warranto.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION TO CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE OR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/ SECURED CREDITOR U/S. 14 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF TAKING POSSESSION/FORCIBLE POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF THE SECURED ASSET
This is a precedent of an Application to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate by Banks/Financial Institutions/Secured Creditor u/s. 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for the purpose of taking possession/forcible possession or control of the Secured Asset. The Bank/Financial Institution/ Secured Creditor has become entitled to the possession of the Secured Asset under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, however, the Borrower is not co-operating.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.