Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION FOR QUASHING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (FIR) UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition For Quashing Of First Information Report (Fir) Under Section 482 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The first information report is registered against you by the investigating agency. The person feels the same is prime facie illegal and not maintainable.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT COMPELLING THE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO TAKE MEASURES UNDER THE PRESCRIBED ACT AND RULES FRAMED THEREIN
This is the precedent of Public Interest Litigation/Writ Petition for compelling the Government Authority to take measures under the prescribed Act (i.e. The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986) and rules famed thereunder.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Prohibition to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ Petition of Prohibition is often issued by a superior court to the lower court directing it not to proceed with a case which does not fall under its jurisdiction.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION TO CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE OR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/ SECURED CREDITOR U/S. 14 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF TAKING POSSESSION/FORCIBLE POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF THE SECURED ASSET
This is a precedent of an Application to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate by Banks/Financial Institutions/Secured Creditor u/s. 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for the purpose of taking possession/forcible possession or control of the Secured Asset. The Bank/Financial Institution/ Secured Creditor has become entitled to the possession of the Secured Asset under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, however, the Borrower is not co-operating.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari is often issued by a superior court to the inferior court, public official, public body corporation tribunal and also government. This petition challenges the Order and demand notice issued by the Stamp Authorities.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart -
LIVING WILL / ADVANCE MEDICAL DIRECTIVES AND ATTORNEY AUTHORISATIONS
This is a living will and advance medical directives and authorizations by Declarant about steps to be adopted if he/she becomes terminally ill or in a permanent vegetative state with no reasonable expectation of coming back to a reasonable quality of life.
Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION SEEKING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COLLEGE FOR GRANT OF RECOGNITION OF THE COURSE
This is a precedent of Writ of Mandamus filed before the Hon'ble High Court where a college is seeking grant of recognition of their course.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY WAY OF COMPANY PETITION/APPEAL FOR RESTORATION OF THE NAME OF THE COMPANY WHICH WAS STRUCK OFF BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
The Company defaulted in filing statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies. Therefore, the Registrar of Companies have struck off the name of the Company from the list of Register of Companies. Now remedy is to approach NCLT. This is the precedent of an Application by way of Company Petition/Appeal for restoration of the name of the Company which was struck off by the Registrar of Companies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION AGAINST THE ORDER OF SESSIONS COURT IN REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF ISSUANCE OF PROCESS
This is a precedent of the Criminal Writ Petition challenging the order passed by the Sessions Court for issuance of process under Section 138 and/or Section 138 read with 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AGAINST THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS FOR TREATING THE PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PATENT AS ABANDONED
This is the precedent of the Writ Of Certiorari and Mandamus against The Controller Of Patents And Designs for Treating the Petitioner’s Application for Grant of Patent as Abandoned. The Controller of Patents and Designs is treating the Petitioner’s Application for grant of Patent as abandoned.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.