Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
₹525.00 (30% OFF)
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION BY A THIRD PARTY TO INTERVENE IN PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 9 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY, CODE 2016 FOR SAFEGUARDING ITS INTEREST AND FOR BEING IMPLEADED AS PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS
The Application under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed before NCLT. A third party desires to intervene in the said proceedings to safeguard its interest and desires to join in the said proceedings as party Respondent. This is the precedent of Miscellaneous Application to be filed before NCLT in the said proceedings to intervene and safeguard the rights of the Applicant/Intervener.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION BY WAY OF COMPANY PETITION/APPEAL FOR RESTORATION OF THE NAME OF THE COMPANY WHICH WAS STRUCK OFF BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
The Company defaulted in filing statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies. Therefore, the Registrar of Companies have struck off the name of the Company from the list of Register of Companies. Now remedy is to approach NCLT. This is the precedent of an Application by way of Company Petition/Appeal for restoration of the name of the Company which was struck off by the Registrar of Companies.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO BE FILED BEFORE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL TO PLACE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ON BOARD FOR URGENT HEARING
The Petition and/or Miscellaneous Application is not reaching for hearing before NCLT and /or one desires to place it on board before the appropriate bench of NCLT for urgent hearing-orders. This is the precedent of an interlocutory application for the same.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
CIVIL APPEAL BEFORE THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (along with Synopsis; Memo of Appeal and Applications for Directions and exemption from filing Certified Copies)
This is the precedent of Civil Appeal (along with interlocutory application) under section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IB Code”) against the Order and judgment passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to be filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Interlocutory Application is for seeking stay of the operation of the Order and Judgment passed by the Learned National Company Law Appellate Tribunal pending the hearing of the Civil Appeal.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
FORM OF DEMAND NOTICE / INVOICE DEMANDING PAYMENT UNDER THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016
You are the bonafide Creditor of the Company and the Company is not paying your dues. You wish to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution process against the Company. You need to serve a demand notice in the prescribed form. This is the standard form of Demand Notice/Invoice demanding payment under the insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹245.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION BY OPERATIONAL CREDITOR UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE,2016
You are the Operational Creditor (not Financial Creditor) of the Company. Your legitimate dues are not paid by the Company inspite of the statutory notie. You need to approach National Company Law Tribunal. This is the standard precedent of an Application by Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.