Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
₹525.00 (30% OFF)
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certain orders passed in a suit before its final decision as provided under Section 104 read with Order 43, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
CIVIL APPEAL BEFORE THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (along with Synopsis; Memo of Appeal and Applications for Directions and exemption from filing Certified Copies)
This is the precedent of Civil Appeal (along with interlocutory application) under section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IB Code”) against the Order and judgment passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to be filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Interlocutory Application is for seeking stay of the operation of the Order and Judgment passed by the Learned National Company Law Appellate Tribunal pending the hearing of the Civil Appeal.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION BY OPERATIONAL CREDITOR UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE,2016
You are the Operational Creditor (not Financial Creditor) of the Company. Your legitimate dues are not paid by the Company inspite of the statutory notie. You need to approach National Company Law Tribunal. This is the standard precedent of an Application by Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO BE FILED BEFORE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL TO PLACE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ON BOARD FOR URGENT HEARING
The Petition and/or Miscellaneous Application is not reaching for hearing before NCLT and /or one desires to place it on board before the appropriate bench of NCLT for urgent hearing-orders. This is the precedent of an interlocutory application for the same.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
COMPANY PETITION FOR OPPRESSION AND MIS MANAGEMENT
The Petitioners are minority shareholders. The Respondents are managing the Company to their benefit and detrimental to the interest of the Company and the Shareholders. The conduct of the Respondents is oppressive. This is the precedent of Company Petition for oppression and mismanagement to be preferred before NCLT.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.