Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
COMPANY PETITION FOR OPPRESSION AND MIS MANAGEMENT
₹525.00 (30% OFF)
The Petitioners are minority shareholders. The Respondents are managing the Company to their benefit and detrimental to the interest of the Company and the Shareholders. The conduct of the Respondents is oppressive. This is the precedent of Company Petition for oppression and mismanagement to be preferred before NCLT.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION BY A THIRD PARTY TO INTERVENE IN PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 9 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY, CODE 2016 FOR SAFEGUARDING ITS INTEREST AND FOR BEING IMPLEADED AS PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS
The Application under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed before NCLT. A third party desires to intervene in the said proceedings to safeguard its interest and desires to join in the said proceedings as party Respondent. This is the precedent of Miscellaneous Application to be filed before NCLT in the said proceedings to intervene and safeguard the rights of the Applicant/Intervener.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
CIVIL APPEAL BEFORE THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (along with Synopsis; Memo of Appeal and Applications for Directions and exemption from filing Certified Copies)
This is the precedent of Civil Appeal (along with interlocutory application) under section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IB Code”) against the Order and judgment passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to be filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Interlocutory Application is for seeking stay of the operation of the Order and Judgment passed by the Learned National Company Law Appellate Tribunal pending the hearing of the Civil Appeal.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 61 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 (`IB CODE’) AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL (NCLT)
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has passed an Order. The aggrieved party desires to challenge the same before The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). This is the precedent of an Appeal challenging the said Order under the provisions of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
NOTICE OF ADMISSION ALONG WITH APPLICATION FOR SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN TWO COMPANIES (Form No. NCLT 1 & 2)
Two Companies are getting merged. This is a standard precedent of Notice of Admission along with Application for Scheme of Arrangement between the Companies to be filed before the National Company Law Tribunal.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
FORM OF DEMAND NOTICE / INVOICE DEMANDING PAYMENT UNDER THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016
You are the bonafide Creditor of the Company and the Company is not paying your dues. You wish to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution process against the Company. You need to serve a demand notice in the prescribed form. This is the standard form of Demand Notice/Invoice demanding payment under the insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹245.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO BE FILED BEFORE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL TO PLACE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ON BOARD FOR URGENT HEARING
The Petition and/or Miscellaneous Application is not reaching for hearing before NCLT and /or one desires to place it on board before the appropriate bench of NCLT for urgent hearing-orders. This is the precedent of an interlocutory application for the same.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION BY WAY OF COMPANY PETITION/APPEAL FOR RESTORATION OF THE NAME OF THE COMPANY WHICH WAS STRUCK OFF BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
The Company defaulted in filing statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies. Therefore, the Registrar of Companies have struck off the name of the Company from the list of Register of Companies. Now remedy is to approach NCLT. This is the precedent of an Application by way of Company Petition/Appeal for restoration of the name of the Company which was struck off by the Registrar of Companies.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION BY THE FINANCIAL CREDITOR TO INITIATE CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER SECTION 7 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 READ WITH RULE 4 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016.
The Financial Creditors are not paid by the Company and they need to commence Insolvency Resolution Process against the Company. This is the standard precedent of an Application by the Financial Creditor to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 4 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
APPLICATION BY OPERATIONAL CREDITOR UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE,2016
You are the Operational Creditor (not Financial Creditor) of the Company. Your legitimate dues are not paid by the Company inspite of the statutory notie. You need to approach National Company Law Tribunal. This is the standard precedent of an Application by Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.