Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale! 
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari is often issued by a superior court to the inferior court, public official, public body corporation tribunal and also government. This petition challenges the Order and demand notice issued by the Stamp Authorities.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. This is the Writ Petition challenging the Order of deemed conveyance by quasi Judicial authority in respect of Freehold property.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TITLE OF THE FILM (TRADE MARK)
The plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The plaintiff’s application for registration of the trademark being the title of the film is pending. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on plaintiff’s title and pass off his film as the plaintiff’s film or remake of the plaintiff’s film or in any kind encashing the plaintiff’s goodwill. This is the suit for restraining the defended from doing so and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OF THE TRADEMARKED DESIGN
This is the precedent of suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from doing so and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark which consist of unique design. The Defendant is using the said design in infringement of Plaintiff’s registered trademark.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARK
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Journal, Notice of Opposition and Counter Statement to Notice of Opposition are filed. This is the precedent of Affidavit of Evidence in support of opposition to be filed by the party who is opposing the registration of the Trade Mark.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION OF MANDAMUS SEEKING DIRECTION FOR REGISTRATION OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (F.I.R.)
The Police is not acting on your Complaint and not registering First Information Report (FIR). This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition of Mandamus Seeking Direction For Registration of First Information Report (F.I.R.).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Prohibition to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ Petition of Prohibition is often issued by a superior court to the lower court directing it not to proceed with a case which does not fall under its jurisdiction.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
The Magistrate's court and also Session's court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session's court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF DEVICE MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Device Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT COMPELLING THE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO TAKE MEASURES UNDER THE PRESCRIBED ACT AND RULES FRAMED THEREIN
This is the precedent of Public Interest Litigation/Writ Petition for compelling the Government Authority to take measures under the prescribed Act (i.e. The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986) and rules famed thereunder.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF THE TRADEMARKED TITLE OF THE FILM
This is the precedent of suit/plaint restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from releasing the cinematographic film with the said title and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on the plaintiff’s registered trademark title.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.