Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
AN APPLICATION TO CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE OR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/ SECURED CREDITOR U/S. 14 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF TAKING POSSESSION/FORCIBLE POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF THE SECURED ASSET
₹750 ₹525 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an Application to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate by Banks/Financial Institutions/Secured Creditor u/s. 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for the purpose of taking possession/forcible possession or control of the Secured Asset. The Bank/Financial Institution/ Secured Creditor has become entitled to the possession of the Secured Asset under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, however, the Borrower is not co-operating.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

APPLICATION FOR DISPENSING WITH THE CONDITION IMPOSED WHILE GRANTING ANTICIPATORY BAIL
The Conditions are imposed while granting Anticipatory Bail (ABA). The Applicant wants to apply to the Court for dispensing with the conditions. This is the precedent for the same.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

NOTICE TO BORROWERS AND THE GUARANTORS UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002 BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
This is a precedent of notice by the Banks/Financial Institutions to the Borrower and the guarantors under Section 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993 TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
This is a precedent of an Application by Banks/Financial Institutions under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to recover debt before Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

REPLY UNDER SECTION 13 (3A) OF SARFAESI, 2002 OF THE BORROWER/GUARANTORS TO STATUTORY NOTICE OF BANK/FINANCIAL INSTITUTION UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002
This is a precedent of reply under Section 13 (3A) of Sarfaesi, 2002 of the Borrower/Guarantors to statutory notice of Bank/Financial Institution under Section 13 (2) of Sarfaesi, 2002
Rated 5.00 out of 5₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 BY A THIRD PARTY WHO IS NEITHER BORROWER NOR GUARANTOR
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a Notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same against the property of a third party who is neither a borrower nor a guarantor nor in any manner responsible to Bank/ Financial Institution. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 by a third party to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION BY A THIRD PARTY TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL FOR VACATING AN INJUNCTION ORDER PASSED AGAINST HIS PROPERTY FOR THE DEBT OF THE BORROWER
This is a precedent of an Application by a third party to Debt Recovery Tribunal for vacating an injunction order passed against his property for recovery of Debt of Borrowers/Guarantors.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

BAIL APPLICATION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 439 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AFTER REJECTION OF THE APPLICATION BY THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT AND SESSIONS COURT
This precedent is of Bail Application before the High Court U/s. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 after rejection of the Application by the Magistrate's court and Session's court.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT FOR EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER WHILE REJECTING AN APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
This is the precedent of an Application before the Session's court for extension of Interim order while rejecting an Application for Anticipatory Bail. An application for an anticipatory bail is rejected. Earlier interim protection was granted. By this Application, the Applicant is seeking continuation of interim protection till he goes to higher court.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

AN APPEAL BEFORE THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 20 OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBT DUE TO BANK AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate F153Tribunal challenging the Order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION SEEKING PERMISSION/LEAVE TO TRAVEL ABROAD WHILE ON BAIL
While allowing the Bail Application, it is practiced to impose condition upon the Applicant not to travel outside India without permission of the Court. This is a precedent of an Application to obtain permission from the Court to travel abroad.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTIES OF THE APPLICANT/ACCUSED SEIZED BY THE POLICE/INVESTIGATING AGENCY
The properties of the accused are seized by the investigating agency. This is the precedent of an application to magistrate’s court for return of seized properties.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.