Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
₹1000 ₹700 (30% OFF)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
The services of Software Developer is engaged by the Company/Buyer for development of the Software. This is a precedent of Software Development Agreement.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

COOKIE POLICY FOR WEBSITES
This is a precedent of Cookie Policy of the owners and operators of website for users/visitors of Website.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALONGWITH FORM NO. 35 (Rule 45) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ASSESSING OFFICER’S ORDER U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT
The Assessing Officer has passed an Order against the Assessee u/s 143 of The Income Tax Act. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal to be filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with 35 [Rule 45] against the Order of the Assessing Officer.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRSTÂ APPEALÂ WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF AÂ SECOND APPEALÂ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION TO THE INCOME TAX ASSESSING OFFICER FOR RECTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 154 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT AGAINST AN ORDER MADE UNDER SECTION 143(1) OF THE ACT
The Income Tax Officer has while passing the Assessment Order u/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, there are some errors apparent on the fact of the record and the Order. This is the precedent of an Application to the Income Tax Assessing Officer for rectification of the Order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act ,1961of an Order made u/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Rated 5.00 out of 5₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 260 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
The Income Tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) has made an Order against the Assessee. The Assessee wants to further challenge the said Order before the Hon’ble High Court. This is the precedent of an Appeal to the High Court against the Order of ITAT under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

MASTER SUBCRIPTION AGREEMENT
The Supplier is a provider of Subscription Services related to Information and Technology (IT) field. This is a precedent of Master Subscription Agreement between the Supplier and the Customer/User for providing such Services.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certain orders passed in a suit before its final decision as provided under Section 104 read with Order 43, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.