Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale!
NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN THE RELEASED FILM
₹525 (30% OFF)
The precedent of a Notice for infringing copyright in the Film. The Producers are the Owners of copyright in the already released Cinematographic Film. Someone is by making a new film infringing the copyright of the said released film.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
REPLY TO OBJECTIONS RAISED IN EXAMINATION REPORT OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS TO THE TRADE MARK APPLICATION
The Application for registration of a trade mark is submitted to the Trade Mark Registry. Upon scrutiny, the Trade Mark Office has raised certain objections by preparing Examination Report and which examination report is required to be dealt with. This is a precedent of the standard reply to the examination report of The Registrar of Trade Marks.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN DESIGN
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the copyright in the design. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INVOCATION NOTICE UNDER ARBTIRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR
Disputes have arose between the Parties and the Agreement between them provides for referring the same to Arbitration. This is the precedent of Invocation Notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator/s to arbitrate dispute between the Parties as per the written contract.
₹245 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF DEVICE MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Device Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARKS, COPYRIGHT AND PASSING OFF (COMPOSITE ACTION)
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for infringement of Trademarks, copyright and passing off (Composite Action) to restrain the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark, copyright and pass off the Plaintiff’s goods as of Defendant and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TITLE OF THE FILM (TRADE MARK)
The plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The plaintiff’s application for registration of the trademark being the title of the film is pending. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on plaintiff’s title and pass off his film as the plaintiff’s film or remake of the plaintiff’s film or in any kind encashing the plaintiff’s goodwill. This is the suit for restraining the defended from doing so and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
This is a precedent of Trade Mark License Agreement whereby the Owner and Proprietor of registered Trade Marks is giving license to use the Trade Marks on the agreed terms.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTRATION OF DESIGN
The Petition is filed before the Controller of Patents and Designs for Cancellation of the registration of Design under the Design Act, 2000. This is a precedent of Counter Statement (Reply) to the Petition for the Cancellation of the registered Design.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF WORD MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Word Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF THE TRADEMARKED TITLE OF THE FILM
This is the precedent of suit/plaint restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and restraining the Defendant from releasing the cinematographic film with the said title and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on the plaintiff’s registered trademark title.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.