Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
APPLICATION TO THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK FROM THE TRADE MARK REGISTER /APPLICATION FOR RECTIFICATION OF THE TRADE MARK REGISTER
₹750 ₹525 (30% OFF)
The Trade Mark is already registered and exists on the trade mark register of the Trade Mark Registry. One wishes to challenge the said registration of trade mark and desires to remove the same from the Trade Mark Register. The civil suit between the parties of infringement/passing off is also pending. This is a precedent of an application to be made to Intellectual Property Appellate Board along with affidavit of an evidence for removal of the trade mark from the register and/or rectification of the register.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF WORD MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Word Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹350₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY BY THE LANDLORDS TO RECOVER THE POSSESSION AND DAMAGES IN RESPECT OF A RESIDENTIAL PREMISES GIVEN ON LEAVE AND LICENSE BASIS ON EXPIRY OF THE PERIOD OF THE LICENSE
This is a precedent of an application to the Competent Authority by the Landlords to recover the possession and damages in respect of a residential premises given on leave and license basis on expiry of the period of the license and for consequential reliefs under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA).
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of an Affidavit of Evidence in support of the Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹600₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION TO THE TRADE MARK REGISTRAR FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK FROM THE TRADE MARK REGISTER/APPLICATION FOR RECTIFICATION OF THE TRADE MARK REGISTER
The Trade Mark is already registered and exists on the trade mark register of the Trade Mark Registry. One wishes to challenge the said registration of trade mark and desires to remove the same from the Trade Mark Register. This is a precedent of an application to be made to The Registrar of Trade Marks for removal of the trade mark from the register and/or rectification of the register.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT
This is the precedent of the plaint for restraining the defendant from infringing the plaintiff’s registered patent and for consequential reliefs. The plaintiff is the registered owner of the patent. The defendant is attempting to infringe the same.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR PASSING OFF THE TITLE OF THE FILM (TRADE MARK)
The plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the trademark being the title of the cinematographic film. The plaintiff’s application for registration of the trademark being the title of the film is pending. The defendant is attempting to make a film based on plaintiff’s title and pass off his film as the plaintiff’s film or remake of the plaintiff’s film or in any kind encashing the plaintiff’s goodwill. This is the suit for restraining the defended from doing so and for consequential reliefs.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN DESIGN
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the copyright in the design. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

TRADEMARK APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF DEVICE MARK BEFORE TRADEMARK REGISTRY
These are the precedents of the Application for registration of a Device Trade Mark along with the authorization form and affidavit in use of the Trade Mark to be submitted to the Trade Mark Registry along with prescribed fee. The affidavit is use normally is to be filed if the Applicant’s use of the Trade Mark is prior to the date of the Application.
₹350₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

ASSIGNMENT OF TRADEMARKS ALONG WITH THE BENEFIT OF APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS
This is a precedent of an agreement for assignment of Trade Marks along with the benefit of pending applications for registration of Trade Marks.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

CEASE AND DESIST NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARK, BEING THE TITLE OF THE CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM
This is the precedent of a Cease and desist Notice for infringement of the trademark being the title of the feature film. The producers are the registered proprietor of the trade mark being the title of the film. Someone is in infringement of the Producers’ proprietary right in the said title making a film with the same title.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

SUIT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.