Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION OF MANDAMUS SEEKING DIRECTION FOR REGISTRATION OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (F.I.R.)
₹1000 ₹700 (30% OFF)
The Police is not acting on your Complaint and not registering First Information Report (FIR). This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition of Mandamus Seeking Direction For Registration of First Information Report (F.I.R.).
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
Writ of quo warranto means a writ that you can be issued to restrain a person from holding any public office in the capacity of a Public Officer to which he/she does not have the entitlement. Here, the term Quo-Warranto means, "by what authority"; or, "on whose authority is one holding a public office". This is a precedent of Writ Petition of Quo Warranto.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

AN APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED UNDER SECTION 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
An order for ABA is already granted, however, the Accused/Applicant has breached the conditions imposed by the court. This is the precedent of an Application for cancellation of ABA.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. In the instant case, the Deemed Conveyance Order is passed of the larger plot of land inspite of ongoing development, conflicting the right of other societies.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AGAINST THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS FOR TREATING THE PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PATENT AS ABANDONED
This is the precedent of the Writ Of Certiorari and Mandamus against The Controller Of Patents And Designs for Treating the Petitioner’s Application for Grant of Patent as Abandoned. The Controller of Patents and Designs is treating the Petitioner’s Application for grant of Patent as abandoned.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF CERTIORARI FOR QUASHING IMPUGNED NOTICES/ANALYSIS REPORTS UNDER FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT, 2006
This is the precedent of the Writ of Certiorari for Quashing Impugned Notices/Analysis Reports Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Food, safety and standard authority of India has issued recall notices to the Petitioner for recall of the petitioner’s products from the market.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF PROHIBITION TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
This is the precedent of Writ of Prohibition to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ Petition of Prohibition is often issued by a superior court to the lower court directing it not to proceed with a case which does not fall under its jurisdiction.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
This is the precedent of an application for Anticipatory Bail before the sessions court U/s. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to seek protection from an arrest on the basis of FIR registered.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE FOR QUASHING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES)
This is the precedent of Writ petition for quashing of First Information Report (FIR) to the High Court by consent of the parties.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL CONTEMPT)
This is a precedent of Contempt Petition (Criminal Contempt) under section 15 of The Contempt of Court Act, 1971.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.