Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
AN APPLICATION TO CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE OR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/ SECURED CREDITOR U/S. 14 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF TAKING POSSESSION/FORCIBLE POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF THE SECURED ASSET
₹750.00 ₹525.00 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an Application to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate by Banks/Financial Institutions/Secured Creditor u/s. 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for the purpose of taking possession/forcible possession or control of the Secured Asset. The Bank/Financial Institution/ Secured Creditor has become entitled to the possession of the Secured Asset under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, however, the Borrower is not co-operating.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF A PRIVATE COMPLAINT FOR COMPOUNDABLE OFFENCES
The parties have settle the dispute in a private complaint involving compoundable offences. This is the precedent of an application for withdrawal of a private complaint for compoundable offences.
₹750.00₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED UNDER SECTION 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
An order for ABA is already granted, however, the Accused/Applicant has breached the conditions imposed by the court. This is the precedent of an Application for cancellation of ABA.
₹750.00₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
The Magistrate's court and also Session's court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session's court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE HIGH COURT’S ORDER ON CRIMINAL (BAIL) APPLICATION
The High Court has rejected the Bail Application of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. This the precedent of Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India challenging the High Court's Order on Criminal (Bail) Application.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF BAIL UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 437(A) (WHERE ACCUSED IS ACQUITTED) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973
This is the precedent of an Application for Grant of Bail under the provisions of Sec 437 (A) (where Accused is acquitted) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
₹750.00₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
NOTICE TO BORROWERS AND THE GUARANTORS UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002 BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
This is a precedent of notice by the Banks/Financial Institutions to the Borrower and the guarantors under Section 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
₹500.00₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 397 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT U/S. 102 OF THE SAID CODE REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE BANK ACCOUNTS
The Magistrate's court has refused to de-freeze Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Session's court. This is the precedent of Revision Application before the Session Court U/S. 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the order of the Magistrate's Court U/s. 102 of the said code refusing to de-freeze Bank Account
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 BY A THIRD PARTY WHO IS NEITHER BORROWER NOR GUARANTOR
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a Notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same against the property of a third party who is neither a borrower nor a guarantor nor in any manner responsible to Bank/ Financial Institution. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 by a third party to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹750.00₹525.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
REPLY UNDER SECTION 13 (3A) OF SARFAESI, 2002 OF THE BORROWER/GUARANTORS TO STATUTORY NOTICE OF BANK/FINANCIAL INSTITUTION UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002
This is a precedent of reply under Section 13 (3A) of Sarfaesi, 2002 of the Borrower/Guarantors to statutory notice of Bank/Financial Institution under Section 13 (2) of Sarfaesi, 2002
Rated 5.00 out of 5₹750.00₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹1,000.00₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
AN APPLICATION BY A THIRD PARTY TO DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL FOR VACATING AN INJUNCTION ORDER PASSED AGAINST HIS PROPERTY FOR THE DEBT OF THE BORROWER
This is a precedent of an Application by a third party to Debt Recovery Tribunal for vacating an injunction order passed against his property for recovery of Debt of Borrowers/Guarantors.
₹750.00₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.