Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
ADMIRALTY SUIT FOR MARITIME CLAIM
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Plaintiff has maritime claim against the Owner of the Vessel who has failed to pay Plaintiff’s claim. The Vessel is within Indian territorial waters. For security and recovery of the Plaintiff’s claim, the Plaintiff is desirous to arrest and detain the Vessel under The Admiralty Act, 2017. This is a precedent of Admiralty suit in respect of maritime claim to be filed before the concerned High Court for arrest and detention of ship and monetary claim.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT BY DAUGHTER CLAIMING SHARE IN FATHER’S HUF AND PARTITION OF HUF PROPERTIES
The Daughter is claiming share in properties of father’s Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Daughter claiming share in Father’s HUF and portion of HUF properties.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL SUIT TO RECOVER MONEY (NOT A SUMMARY SUIT)
This is a precedent of Regular Civil Suit to recover money from the Defendant (Not a Summary Suit).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF THE DECEASED
The disputes and differences have arisen amongst the legal heirs of the deceased in respect of the estate of the deceased. This is a precedent of Suit for Administration of the Estate of the Deceased.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PREVENTION OF MISUSE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION/DATA/TRADE SECRETS
This is the suit for Prevention of misuse of Confidential Information/Data/Trade Secrets. The Defendant being an ex-employee of the Plaintiff is attempting or misusing confidential information, data and trade secrets of the Plaintiff.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN DESIGN
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the copyright in the design. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the design.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (i) THE TENANT HAS UNLAWFULLY SUB-LET OR GIVEN ON LICENSE THE PREMISES UNDER SECTION 16(1)(e) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND (ii) THE PREMISES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE IMMEDIATE PURPOSE OF DEMOLITION ORDERED BY ANY MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OR OTHER COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 16(1)(k) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999.
This is a precedent of an eviction suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court or before the court of civil judge for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises on the grounds that the Tenant has unlawfully sublet or given on license the premises as contemplated under section 16(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and further that the said premises are required by the landlord for immediate demolition as ordered by the concerned authority under section 16(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 .
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The parties have entered into an Agreement. The disputes have arisen. This is a precedent of Suit for Specific Performance.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BY PLAINTIFFS/TENANTS UNDER THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT,1999 FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE THE TENANTS OF THE SUIT PREMISES
This is a precedent of the suit by the Tenants for order and decree declaring the Plaintiffs as the monthly tenants of the suit premises under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS NOT USED THE PREMISES FOR A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX MONTHS UNDER SECTION 16(1)(n) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court or before the court of civil judge for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises on the ground that the Tenant has not used the said premises for a continuous period of more than six months as contemplated under section 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.